Advance Search
Volume 30 Issue 10
Oct.  2014
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
ZHANG Xiao-ru, SHI Jing, PENG Huai-qing.et al, . Effects of mental health intervention among junior middle-school students after Lushan earthquake[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2014, 30(10): 1338-1341. doi: 10.11847/zgggws2014-30-10-34
Citation: ZHANG Xiao-ru, SHI Jing, PENG Huai-qing.et al, . Effects of mental health intervention among junior middle-school students after Lushan earthquake[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2014, 30(10): 1338-1341. doi: 10.11847/zgggws2014-30-10-34

Effects of mental health intervention among junior middle-school students after Lushan earthquake

doi: 10.11847/zgggws2014-30-10-34
  • Received Date: 2013-08-05
  • Publish Date: 2014-10-10
  • Objective To explore mental health and the effect of mental health intervention among junior middle-school students in Lushan earthquake disaster area.Methods Symptoms Checklist-90(SCL-90), Self-Rating Anxiety Scale(SAS)and Self-Rating Depression Scale(SDS)were used to assess the mental health among 600 students before and after a psychological intervention in the disaster area.Results Before the intervention, the three severe psychological problems in the students were depression(19.83%), anxiety(19.31%), and compulsive symptoms(18.80%).Before the intervention, the female students showed significantly higher scores than the male students in total SCL-90 score(181.42±32.89 vs. 173.61±33.98), somatizatiion(1.61±0.43 vs. 1.54±0.40), depression(2.20±0.49 vs. 2.12±0.53), anxiety(2.14±0.50 vs. 2.03±0.48), terror(2.08±0.54 vs. 1.95±0.53), SDS score(46.97±4.95 vs. 45.81±5.43), and SAS score(43.44±5.75 vs. 42.11±6.86)(all P<0.05).After the intervention, female students still showed higher scores than male students in total SCL-90 score(151.18±30.41 vs. 147.67±24.17), somatization(1.56±0.39 vs. 1.49±0.38), depression(1.72±0.35 vs. 1.65±0.44), anxiety(1.76±0.41 vs. 1.67±0.40), and terror(1.58±0.48 vs. 1.44±0.39)(all P<0.05).After the intervention, both male and female students showed significantly decreased scores in total SCL-90 score and its domains, SDS, and SAS(t=2.190-14.548 for male and t=1.974-14.004 for female;all P<0.05).Conclusion The mental health status was improved obviously after the mental health intervention among junior middle-school students in Lushan earthquake disaster area and there was a gender difference in mental health among the students.
  • loading
  • [1]
    刘秀芬,黄悦勤,李立明.大学生人格障碍病例对照研究[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2000,14(2):88-92.
    [2]
    汪向东,张华彪,新福尚隆,等.地震后受灾群体生活质量研究[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1999,13(1):242.
    [3]
    汪向东,王希林,马弘.心理卫生评定量表手册[M].北京:中国心理卫生杂志社,1999:306-310.
    [4]
    吴文源,焦虑自评量表[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1999,(增刊):235-238.
    [5]
    舒良.抑郁自评量表[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1999,(增刊):194-197.
    [6]
    张国勋.用社会大卫生观看健康的必要性和重要性[J].中国健康教育,1995,11(5):37-38.
    [7]
    刘斌志.地震后灾区儿童心理应激障碍表现及疏导对策[J].中国公共卫生,2008,24(10):1153-1154.
    [8]
    李权超,王应立.军人心理应激反应与心理危机干预[J].临床心身疾病杂志,2006,12(2):136-138.
    [9]
    季建林,徐俊冕.危机干预的理论与实践[J].临床医学杂志,1994,4(2):116-118.
    [10]
    张理义,陈春霞,徐志熊.地震灾难后的心理危机干预[J].人民军医,2008,51(7):411-412.
    [11]
    张玉茹.突发社会灾难的危机干预研究[J].河南师范大学学报:哲学社会科学版,2004,31(1):93-95.
    [12]
    刘欣,陈青萍.来自地震灾区大初中生心理应激特征与干预策略[J].中国健康心理学杂志,2009,17(3):294-296.
    [13]
    杨艳杰,乔正学,邱晓惠,等.地震灾区青少年初中生心理健康状况调查[J].中国公共卫生,2008,12(24):1512-1513.
    [14]
    ReinherzH Z,ParadisA D,GiaconiaR M,et al.Childhood and adolescent predictors of major depression in the transition to adulthood[J].Am J Psychiatry,2003,160(12):2141-2217.
    [15]
    尹明华,洪森荣.青少年灾后心理应激障碍及干预模式评价[J].中国公共卫生,2009,25(7):814-816.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Article views (1115) PDF downloads(84) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Publishing history
    • Receive:  2013-08-05
    • Published:  2014-10-10

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return