Advance Search
Volume 39 Issue 3
Mar.  2023
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
WU Li, LIU Qing, FAN Gao-jie, . Association of interpregnancy weight change with adverse birth outcome: an analysis based on delivery records of Guangdong province[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2023, 39(3): 306-311. doi: 10.11847/zgggws1138312
Citation: WU Li, LIU Qing, FAN Gao-jie, . Association of interpregnancy weight change with adverse birth outcome: an analysis based on delivery records of Guangdong province[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2023, 39(3): 306-311. doi: 10.11847/zgggws1138312

Association of interpregnancy weight change with adverse birth outcome: an analysis based on delivery records of Guangdong province

doi: 10.11847/zgggws1138312
  • Received Date: 2022-02-24
    Available Online: 2023-01-10
  • Publish Date: 2023-03-10
  •   Objective  To investigate associations of interpregnancy weight change with preterm birth, low birth weight, macrosomia, small for gestational age (SGA), and large for gestational age (LGA).   Methods  The data on 6 589 pregnant women having two or more singleton live births during 2015 – 2020 and their newborns were extracted from the Maternal and Child Health Information System of Guangdong province. The pregnant women were assigned into four groups according to the changes in their interpregnancy body mass index (BMI) of <−1, −1 – <1 , 1 – <3, and ≥ 3 kg/m2. Logistic regression model was used to assess the associations of interpregnancy BMI change with adverse birth outcomes.   Results  In all the newborns, the proportion was 5.5% for preterm birth, 4.7% for low birth weight, 2.4% for macrosomia, 11.4% for SGA, and 5.4% for LGA, respectively. The results of logistic regression analysis showed that compared to those with the interpregnancy BMI change of −1 – < 1, the pregnant women having the change of 1 – < 3 have an increased risk of giving a birth to a macrosomia (odds ratio [OR] = 1.66, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.13 – 2.24); the women with the interpregnancy BMI change of 3 and more have an increased risk of giving a birth to a macrosomia (OR = 2.31, 95% CI: 1.42 – 3.70) and to a LGA infant (OR = 1.87, 95% CI: 1.33 – 2.60); while, each increase of 1 kg/m2 in interpregnancy BMI is associated with a 7% decreased risk of SGA (OR = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.89 – 0.97). No significant association of interpregnancy BMI change with preterm birth or low birth weight was observed (P > 0.05).   Conclusion  Pregnant women′s interpregnancy weight gain is associated with increased risks of macrosomia and LGA of their newborns. The results suggest that body weight control during pregnancy and after delivery need to be promoted among pregnant women.
  • loading
  • [1]
    Barker DJP, Eriksson JG, Forsén T, et al. Fetal origins of adult disease: strength of effects and biological basis[J]. International Journal of Epidemiology, 2002, 31(6): 1235 – 1239. doi: 10.1093/ije/31.6.1235
    [2]
    Poston L, Caleyachetty R, Cnattingius S, et al. Preconceptional and maternal obesity: epidemiology and health consequences[J]. The Lancet Diabetes and Endocrinology, 2016, 4(12): 1025 – 1036. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(16)30217-0
    [3]
    Aune D, Saugstad OD, Henriksen T, et al. Maternal body mass index and the risk of fetal death, stillbirth, and infant death: a systematic review and meta - analysis[J]. JAMA, 2014, 311(15): 1536 – 1546. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.2269
    [4]
    Goldstein RF, Abell SK, Ranasinha S, et al. Association of gestational weight gain with maternal and infant outcomes: a systematic review and meta - analysis[J]. JAMA, 2017, 317(21): 2207 – 2225. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.3635
    [5]
    彭安娜, 张斌, 李娜, 等. 孕前超重/肥胖与婴儿不良出生结局关系前瞻性队列研究[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2019, 35(2): 162 – 166. doi: 10.11847/zgggws1118878
    [6]
    Jain AP, Gavard JA, Rice JJ, et al. The impact of interpregnancy weight change on birthweight in obese women[J]. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2013, 208(3): 205.e1 – 205.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.12.018
    [7]
    Villamor E, Cnattingius S. Interpregnancy weight change and risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes: a population - based study[J]. The Lancet, 2006, 368(9542): 1164 – 1170. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69473-7
    [8]
    Wallace JM, Bhattacharya S, Campbell DM, et al. Inter - pregnancy weight change impacts placental weight and is associated with the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in the second pregnancy[J]. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 2014, 14: 40. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-40
    [9]
    Girsen AI, Mayo JA, Wallenstein MB, et al. What factors are related to recurrent preterm birth among underweight women?[J]. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, 2018, 31(5): 560 – 566. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1292243
    [10]
    Merlino A, Laffineuse L, Collin M, et al. Impact of weight loss between pregnancies on recurrent preterm birth[J]. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2006, 195(3): 818 – 821. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.06.043
    [11]
    Benjamin RH, Littlejohn S, Canfield MA, et al. Interpregnancy change in body mass index and infant outcomes in Texas: a population - based study[J]. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 2019, 19(1): 119. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2265-z
    [12]
    McBain RD, Dekker GA, Clifton VL, et al. Impact of inter - pregnancy BMI change on perinatal outcomes: a retrospective cohort study[J]. EuropeanJournal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 2016, 205: 98 – 104. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.07.487
    [13]
    Bender W, Hirshberg A, Levine LD. Interpregnancy body mass index changes: distribution and impact on adverse pregnancy outcomes in the subsequent pregnancy[J]. American Journal of Perinatology, 2019, 36(5): 517 – 521. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1670634
    [14]
    张晓辉, 陈艳敏, 孙瑜, 等. 浙江省出生缺陷人群监测地区不同生育政策时期生育情况分析[J]. 中华预防医学杂志, 2020, 54(5): 519 – 522. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112150-20190706-0054
    [15]
    陈友华, 孙永健. “三孩”生育新政: 缘起、预期效果与政策建议[J]. 人口与社会, 2021, 37(3): 1 – 12.
    [16]
    Regan AK, Gissler M, Magnus MC, et al. Association between interpregnancy interval and adverse birth outcomes in women with a previous stillbirth: an international cohort study[J]. The Lancet, 2019, 393(10180): 1527 – 1535. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32266-9
    [17]
    Sorbye LM, Skjaerven R, Klungsoyr K, et al. Gestational diabetes mellitus and interpregnancy weight change: a population - based cohort study[J]. PLoS Medicine, 2017, 14(8): e1002367. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002367
    [18]
    Kerényi Z, Tamas G, Kivimaki M, et al. Maternal glycemia and risk of large - for - gestational - age babies in a population-based screening[J]. Diabetes Care, 2009, 32(12): 2200 – 2205. doi: 10.2337/dc09-1088
    [19]
    齐秀英, 王楠. 巨大儿发生率及相关危险因素研究[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2005, 21(10): 1162 – 1163. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-0580.2005.10.005
    [20]
    Kominiarek MA, PeacemanAM. Gestational weight gain[J]. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2017, 217(6): 642 – 651. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.05.040
    [21]
    何静, 叶青, 王志勇, 等. 南京市城区居民身高、体重和腰围自我报告值与客观测量值的一致性分析[J]. 中华疾病控制杂志, 2018, 22(2): 208 – 210转214. doi: 10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz.2018.02.026
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(1)  / Tables(3)

    Article views (319) PDF downloads(25) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Publishing history
    • Receive:  2022-02-24
    • Online:  2023-01-10
    • Published:  2023-03-10

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return