Advanced Search
ZHOU Yalin, ZHANHG Yixin, TIAN Xinyu, HAN Yang, SUN Chengxi, MA Jingyu, LI Qun, XU Zhen, MA Jixiang. Establishment of an indicator system for assessing public health emergency response capacity at county/district level : a Delphi study[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2023, 39(9): 1180-1184. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1141479
Citation: ZHOU Yalin, ZHANHG Yixin, TIAN Xinyu, HAN Yang, SUN Chengxi, MA Jingyu, LI Qun, XU Zhen, MA Jixiang. Establishment of an indicator system for assessing public health emergency response capacity at county/district level : a Delphi study[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2023, 39(9): 1180-1184. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1141479

Establishment of an indicator system for assessing public health emergency response capacity at county/district level : a Delphi study

  •   Objective  To establish a set of indicators for assessing the public health emergency response capacity at county/district level in China.
      Methods  An indicator system for evaluating public health emergency response capacity at county/district level was initially formulated based on theoretical research and literature review. Three rounds of Delphi consultation were conducted among 18 senior professionals to determine the indicators and their weights of the system using hierarchical analysis method.
      Results  For the 3 rounds of expert consultation, the positive coefficients of the were 100.0%, 88.9%, and 88.9%; the expert authority coefficients were 0.87, 0.84, and 0.87; and the coordination coefficients of expert opinions were 0.207, 0.210, and 0.295 (all P < 0.001), indicating a good coordination of the experts′ opinions. The finally established indicator system for assessing public health emergency response capacity at county/district level included 5 first-, 19 second-, and 61 third-level indicators. For the third round of Delphi consultation, the experts′ mean scores and ranges of coefficients of variance for importance/feasibility of all the indicators were 4.83 ± 0.13/4.48 ± 0.21 and 0.00 – 0.18/0.07 – 0.22, respectively. The weights for the first-, second-, and third-level indicators ranged from 0.094 to 0.290, 0.011 to 0.119, and 0.001 to 0.087, respectively.
      Conclusion  The established indicator system could be used to develop tools for evaluating public health emergency response capacities at county/district level, while the reliability and validity of the indicator system need to be assessed further.
  • loading

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return