高级检索
李兵, 祝新红, 王雄虎, 林建昌, 缪华章, 马远珠, 赵庆国. 广东省二孩政策背景下产科床位和人员现状分析[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2018, 34(1): 9-13. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1114120
引用本文: 李兵, 祝新红, 王雄虎, 林建昌, 缪华章, 马远珠, 赵庆国. 广东省二孩政策背景下产科床位和人员现状分析[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2018, 34(1): 9-13. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1114120
Bing LI, Xin-hong ZHU, Xiong-hu WANG, . Status quo of bedspace and professional staff for obstetrics service under the two-child policy in Guangdong province[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2018, 34(1): 9-13. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1114120
Citation: Bing LI, Xin-hong ZHU, Xiong-hu WANG, . Status quo of bedspace and professional staff for obstetrics service under the two-child policy in Guangdong province[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2018, 34(1): 9-13. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1114120

广东省二孩政策背景下产科床位和人员现状分析

Status quo of bedspace and professional staff for obstetrics service under the two-child policy in Guangdong province

  • 摘要:
      目的  分析二孩政策背景下产科床位和人员现状,为产科建设相关公共卫生政策的制定提供依据。
      方法  对2015年广东省1 902间有资质的助产机构产科基本情况进行问卷调查,从常规妇幼卫生报表中获取2014 — 2016年全省每月住院分娩活产数。
      结果  2014 — 2016年全省住院分娩活产数均呈逐月上升趋势,但年底会有大幅回落,2016年下半年分娩活产数增幅更大。一、二和三级助产服务机构分别占总机构数的55.58 %、34.70 %和9.73 %,所提供的分娩量分别占15.68 %、49.92 %和34.41 %。被调查机构各指标中位数分别为:顺产平均住院日2.85 d,剖宫产平均住院日6.00 d,床位分娩比1 ∶ 24.83,医师分娩比1 ∶ 90.00,护士分娩比1 ∶ 70.00,医师床位比1 ∶ 3.50,护士床位比1 ∶ 2.62,医护比1 ∶ 1.17;不同地区、不同级别和不同类型助产服务机构间各指标差异均有统计学意义(均P < 0.01)。
      结论  不同地区、级别和类型的助产服务机构面对出生数增长的压力差异大,产科服务能力建设应更注重调整结构性不平衡和内涵质量建设,产科规模扩建需因地制宜。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective  To analyze current status and requirement of bedspace and professional staff for obstetric service under the two-child policy and to provide evidences for making relevant public strategy.
      Methods  We surveyed basic situations of 1 902 eligible obstetrics service institutions in Guangdong with a questionnaire in 2015 and extracted data on the number of live birth (NLBH) in hospitals in Guangdong province from routine monthly reports from 2014 through 2016.
      Results  During the 3-year period, the NLBH in all the institutions increased monthly from February to November in a year and the trend was much more obvious in the later half year of 2016. Of all the institutions surveyed, 55.58 %, 34.70 %, and 9.73 % were categorized into primary, secondary, and tertiary obstetrics institution and the NLBH in the institutions of the three grades accounted for 15.68 %, 49.92 %, and 34.41 % of the total NLBH in the period. For all the institutions, the median hospitalization duration for vaginal delivery and cesarean section were 2.85 and 6.00 days; the ratio of bedspace vs. number of deliveries was 1 : 24.83; the ratio of number of obstetricians vs. number of deliveries was 1 : 90.00; the ratio of number of nurses vs. number of deliveries was 1 : 70.00; the ratio of number of obstetricians vs. bedspace was 1 : 3.50; the ratio of number of nurses vs. bedspace 1 : 2.62; and the ratio of number of obstetricians vs. number of nurses was 1 : 1.17.These indicators for various obstetrics institutions differed significantly by the institutions’ type, category and regional location (P < 0.01 for all).
      Conclusion  The stress of obstetrics service due to the increase in birth numbers is of great discrepancy for obstetrics service institutions of different type, category and region allocation. Balanced structure adjustment and inherent quality improvement should be concerned in capability building of obstetrics service institutions and the expansion of institutions for obstetrics service should be based on local conditions.

     

/

返回文章
返回