高级检索
陈瑶, 王书梅, 曲爽笑, 孙晔. 小学生礼貌用语使用与家庭教养方式关联性[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2018, 34(1): 79-81. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1115056
引用本文: 陈瑶, 王书梅, 曲爽笑, 孙晔. 小学生礼貌用语使用与家庭教养方式关联性[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2018, 34(1): 79-81. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1115056
Yao CHEN, Shu-mei WANG, Shuang-xiao QU, . Relationship between courtesy language usage and parenting style among primary school students in Shanghai city[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2018, 34(1): 79-81. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1115056
Citation: Yao CHEN, Shu-mei WANG, Shuang-xiao QU, . Relationship between courtesy language usage and parenting style among primary school students in Shanghai city[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2018, 34(1): 79-81. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1115056

小学生礼貌用语使用与家庭教养方式关联性

Relationship between courtesy language usage and parenting style among primary school students in Shanghai city

  • 摘要:
      目的  了解小学生礼貌用语使用情况及其与家庭教养方式的关联性。
      方法  于2015年8月采用方便抽样法抽取上海市中心城区4所小学、郊区2所小学四年级849名学生进行匿名问卷调查,主要调查学生及家长一般人口学信息、小学生礼貌用语使用频率、家庭教养方式等内容。
      结果  91.8 %的被调查小学生天天使用“再见”,86.7 %天天使用“谢谢”,75.5 %天天使用“对不起”,66.5 %天天使用“您好”,62.1 %天天使用“请”。除“对不起”1项,男女生礼貌用语使用频率差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。总体来说,男生礼貌用语使用频率低于女生。家庭教养方式中参与维度得分和心理自主维度得分有性别差异(P < 0.05)。其中,女生家庭参与维度得分(26.31 ± 4.01)高于男生家庭(25.34 ± 4.53);男生家庭心理自主维度得分(15.22 ± 4.27)高于女生家庭(14.13 ± 4.22)。5项礼貌用语的使用频率与家庭教养方式中参与维度均存在显著正相关(P < 0.05);除“再见”一项,其余4项礼貌用语使用频率与家庭教养方式中严格/监督维度均存在显著正相关(P < 0.05);目前数据尚未发现礼貌用语的使用频率与家庭教养方式中心理自主维度之间存在关联性。
      结论  小学生礼貌用语使用需要进一步得到加强和改善,特别是对于男生需要重点关注。礼貌用语使用与家庭教养方式中参与维度和严格/监督维度有显著关联性。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective   To examine the situation of courtesy languages using and its relationship with parenting style among primary school students.
      Methods   Totally 849 students of fourth grade were selected from 6 primary schools in Shanghai city with convenience sampling and were surveyed with an anonymous questionnaire in August 2015 to collect information on social-demographic characteristics of the students and parents, the frequency of courtesy languages usage in the students, and the parenting style of the students.
      Results   Among the students, the reported proportions of using the polite expressions every day were 91.8 % for " Goodbye”, 86.7 % for " Thank you”, 75.5 % for " Sorry”, 66.5 % for " Hello”, and 62.1 % for " Please”, respectively; there were significant differences in the reported proportions of polite expressions usage (P < 0.05 for all), except for the usage of the expression of " Sorry”, with generally higher proportions in the girl students than in the boy students. There were significant gender differences in the scores for two dimensions of parenting style, with a higher score for involvement among the girl than among the boy students (26.31 ± 4.01 vs. 25.34 ± 4.53) and a higher score for psychological autonomy among the boy than among the girl students (15.22 ± 4.27 vs. 14.13 ± 4.22) (both P < 0.05). There were significantly positive correlations between the reported proportions of using polite expressions and the score of involvement dimension of parenting style and between the proportions (except for the usage of " Goodbye”) and the score of strictness/supervision dimension of parenting style (both P < 0.05); no significant association of psychological autonomy dimension of parenting style with polite expressions usage was observed among the students.
      Conclusion   The usage of courtesy language needs to be promoted among primary school students, especially among boy students. The involvement and strict/supervision dimensions of parenting style are significantly correlated with courtesy language usage among primary school students.

     

/

返回文章
返回