高级检索
彭锦, 熊婕, 杨龙会, 杨燕, 王传池. 中医“治未病”辨识评估类设备现状分析[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2019, 35(5): 538-541. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1121052
引用本文: 彭锦, 熊婕, 杨龙会, 杨燕, 王传池. 中医“治未病”辨识评估类设备现状分析[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2019, 35(5): 538-541. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1121052
Jin PENG, Jie XIONG, Long-hui YANG, . Application of equipments for identification of pre-clinical disease and assessment of preventive treatment of diseases in traditional Chinese medicine institutions: a cross-sectional survey[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2019, 35(5): 538-541. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1121052
Citation: Jin PENG, Jie XIONG, Long-hui YANG, . Application of equipments for identification of pre-clinical disease and assessment of preventive treatment of diseases in traditional Chinese medicine institutions: a cross-sectional survey[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2019, 35(5): 538-541. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1121052

中医“治未病”辨识评估类设备现状分析

Application of equipments for identification of pre-clinical disease and assessment of preventive treatment of diseases in traditional Chinese medicine institutions: a cross-sectional survey

  • 摘要:
    目的 了解中医“治未病”辨识评估类设备的现状及市场需求。
    方法 采用问卷调研方法,于2017年12月 — 2018年2月对全国各省市的中医医院、养生保健机构及其他健康相关机构开展调研,共计调研658家机构的12 423名中医“治未病”设备的受用者。
    结果 除中医体质辨识系统(378台,60.87 %)外,其他设备购置率均低于35 %;个体生命状态测评类设备常用频率(213台,50.17 %)高于中医体检类设备(356台,35.89 %)。辨识评估类设备存在接受度低和操作时间长的问题,受用者对其总体满意度较高,对“费用”满意度(11 212人次,78.72 %)稍低。
    结论 辨识评估类设备的购置及使用情况良好,未来应从技术要求、标准体系完善等多方面努力,为其研发、推广提供支撑,满足广大群众对中医“治未病”服务的需求。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To examine the status quo of utilization and market demand of equipments for identification of pre-clinical disease and effect evaluation on preventive treatment based on traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) ideology.
    Methods Using random cluster sampling, we conducted a questionnaire survey among 658 TCM hospitals and health care institutions and 12 423 people receiving TCM related examinations in 25 province-level regions across China between December 2017 and February 2018.
    Results For the hospitals and institutions surveyed, the allocation rates of all types of TCM-related detection equipments were less than 35.00%, except for the allocation rate of the TCM constitution identification apparatus (378 sets, 60.87%). The utilization rate of personal life status assessment equipments (213 sets, 50.17%) was higher than that of TCM physical examination equipments (356 sets, 35.89%). Low acceptability and long operation time were among the issues preventing the TCM-related detection equipments from pervasive application indicated by medical staff of the institutions. The people receiving examinations with the TCM-related equipments were generally satisfied to the detections but 78.72% of the examinees were not satisfied with the cost of the detections.
    Conclusion The allocation and utilization of equipments for TCM-related identification of pre-clinical disease and effect evaluation on preventive treatment are generally at a good level but comprehensive efforts are needed to promote the development and application of the equipments for TCM-related detections.

     

/

返回文章
返回