高级检索
王殿玺, 李德, 冯乐安. 澳门在学青少年攻击行为及其与物质滥用关系[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2020, 36(6): 924-928. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1122631
引用本文: 王殿玺, 李德, 冯乐安. 澳门在学青少年攻击行为及其与物质滥用关系[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2020, 36(6): 924-928. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1122631
Dian-xi WANG, De LI, Le-an FENG. Aggressive behavior and its relationship with substance abuse among schooling adolescents in Macao Special Administrative Region[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2020, 36(6): 924-928. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1122631
Citation: Dian-xi WANG, De LI, Le-an FENG. Aggressive behavior and its relationship with substance abuse among schooling adolescents in Macao Special Administrative Region[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2020, 36(6): 924-928. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1122631

澳门在学青少年攻击行为及其与物质滥用关系

Aggressive behavior and its relationship with substance abuse among schooling adolescents in Macao Special Administrative Region

  • 摘要:
      目的  了解澳门在学青少年攻击行为现状、特征以及物质滥用对攻击行为发生的影响。
      方法  于2018年9 — 12月,采用多阶段分层整群抽样方法,对中国澳门地区中小学生进行问卷调查,使用攻击行为调查量表和物质滥用测量方法,对澳门在学青少年的攻击行为和物质滥用状况进行评估。
      结果  本次调查对象共3 664人,澳门在学青少年攻击行为平均总得分为(36.40 ± 19.23)分,其中被动性攻击行为平均得分为(19.94 ± 9.86)分,主动性攻击行为平均得分为(16.46 ± 10.05)分,被动性攻击得分高于主动性攻击。单因素分析结果显示,澳门在学青少年攻击行为得分的年级差异有统计学意义(P < 0.001),初中年级学生的攻击行为得分高于小学和高中年级;在学青少年攻击行为得分因学习成绩而异且有统计学意义(P < 0.001),学习成绩较好的在学青少年攻击行为得分低于学习成绩差者;主观生活满意度与在学青少年攻击行为得分显著相关(P = 0.005),生活满意度较高的在学青少年攻击行为得分更低。多因素线性回归结果显示,曾经饮酒次数(P = 0.012)、最近1个月饮酒频率(P < 0.001)、最近1个月吸烟频率(P < 0.001)、最近1个月吸食毒品频率(P = 0.027)是影响在学青少年攻击行为的重要因素。
      结论  澳门在学青少年的被动性攻击行为水平高于主动性攻击行为,物质滥用是攻击行为衍生的风险因素,需要家庭、学校、政府和社会共同行动以预防和减少青少年攻击行为的发生。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective  To examine prevalence characteristics of aggression behavior and the association of substance abuse with aggression behavior among schooling adolescents in Macao Special Administrative Region (Macao).
      Methods  We conducted a self-administered anonymous questionnaire survey among 4 306 primary and high school students selected using stratified multistage cluster sampling in Macao, China from September to December 2018. Reactive-Proactive Aggression Questionnaire (RPQ) and a questionnaire on demographics and smoking, alcohol drinking and drug abuse were adopted in the survey.
      Results  For a total of 3 664 valid respondents, the average overall score of aggression behavior was 36.40 ± 19.23 and the average score of reactive aggression was higher than that of proactive aggression (19.94 ± 9.86 vs. 16.46 ± 10.05). Univariate analysis demonstrated that the aggressive behavior scores of the respondents differed significantly by schooling grade and academic performance (both P < 0.001); the scores of junior high school students was higher than that of pupils and senior high school students; the scores of students with better academic performance was lower than that of students with poor academic performance. The respondents′ subjective life satisfaction was significantly correlated with their aggressive behavior scores (P = 0.005), with a lower score among the respondents with higher subjective life satisfaction. Multivariate linear regression indicated that accumulated times of alcohol drinking (P = 0.012), the frequency of alcohol drinking in previous one month (P < 0.001), the frequency of smoking in previous one month (P < 0.001), and the frequency of drug use in previous one month (P = 0.027) were significant influencing factors of aggression behavior among the respondents.
      Conclusion  The prevalence of reactive aggression behavior is higher than that of proactive aggression and substance abuse is a significant risk factor for aggressive behavior among schooling adolescents in Macao. Comprehensive interventions should be promoted to reduce aggressive behavior in the adolescents.

     

/

返回文章
返回