Establishment of an integrated index for family socioeconomic gradients based on the Birth Cohort Study in Guangzhou
-
摘要:
目的 构建从整体上反映母儿所处社会经济状况(SES)的家庭社会经济梯度复合指标。 方法 收集2012年2月 — 2016年6月加入广东省广州出生队列的16175对孕妇及其子代的社会、经济等相关信息,分别采用主成分分析(PCA)和Z-score加和法构建家庭SES评分,并比较不同社会经济变量组合用于评价社会经济梯度的一致性。 结果 母亲文化程度、父亲文化程度、母亲月均收入、父亲月均收入、母亲就职状态、房产拥有情况、私家车拥有情况、人均居住面积、居住楼层9个变量中,除母亲就职状态与人均居住面积和居住楼层不存在相关关系外,其余各变量均两两相关(r = – 0.036~0.585,均P < 0.01)。基于此9个社会经济变量运用PCA和Z-score加和法构建的复合评分方法判断孕妇SES分组的加权Kappa系数为0.737(95 % CI = 0.730~0.743),2种方法的一致性较强,均能较好地反映母儿的家庭社会经济梯度;其中由母亲文化程度、父亲文化程度、母亲月均收入、父亲月均收入、房产拥有情况、私家车拥有情况、人均居住面积和居住楼层8个家庭SES变量Z-score加和法与母亲文化程度、父亲文化程度、母亲月均收入、父亲月均收入、母亲就职状态、房产拥有情况、私家车拥有情况、人均居住面积、居住楼层9个SES变量PCA法所得分组一致性最强Kappa值为0.774(0.768~0.780)。 结论 基于母亲文化程度、父亲文化程度、母亲月均收入、父亲月均收入、母亲就职状态、房产拥有情况、私家车拥有情况、人均居住面积、居住楼层9个变量的综合指标能较客观地反映母儿所处的家庭社会经济梯度。 Abstract:Objective To construct an integrated index of family socioeconomic gradient for providing a valid assessment of socioeconomic status (SES) of the mother and her child/children in a family. Methods The participants of the study were 16 175 pregnant women and their children enrolled between February 2012 and June 2016 from the Birth Cohort Study in Guangzhou. Information on social and economic condition of the children′s parents were collected. Principal components analysis (PCA) and standard score (Z-score) summative method were used to construct a family SES score. The consistency among different combinations of socioeconomic variables in the evaluation on families′ socio-economic gradient were compared. Results Significant pairwise correlations were observed among 9 parental socioeconomic variables (maternal education, paternal education, average maternal monthly income, average paternal monthly income, maternal employment, family real estate ownership, private car ownership, per capita living space, and residential floor), except for the associations of maternal employment with per capita living space and residential floor; the coefficients for the correlations ranged from – 0.036 to 0.585 (P < 0.01 for all). The SES grouping of the pregnant women by the integrated index established using PCA method on account of the nine variables was consistent well with that using Z-score summative method, with a weighted Kappa coefficient of 0.737 (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.730 – 0.743); both of the indexes could accurately reflect the mothers′ and children′s family socioeconomic gradients. An integrated index established using the Z-score summative method based on 8 parental socioeconomic variables showed the best consistence with that using PCA method on account of the 9 parental socioeconomic variables, with a weighted Kappa coefficient of 0.774 (95% CI: 0.768 – 0.780). Conclusion The integrated index established in the study using PCA method and Z-score summative method based on 9 parental socioeconomic variables could be used to conduct valid assessment on family socioeconomic gradients of Chinese women and children. -
Key words:
- family socioeconomic gradient /
- integrated index /
- establishment /
- birth cohort
-
表 1 简化SES梯度构建方法与基于9个SES变量PCA梯度比较
分组方法(Z-score加和法) a PCA法(9个SES变量) 加权Kappa系数(95 % CI) 分组一致数 一致性强度 家庭8个SES变量 0.774(0.768~0.780) 11704 较强 父母亲4个SES变量 0.737(0.731~0.744) 10837 较强 母亲4个SES变量 0.565(0.556~0.573) 8484 中等 父亲4个SES变量 0.591(0.582~0.599) 8811 中等 注:a 家庭8个SES变量包括母亲文化程度、父亲文化程度、母亲月均收入、父亲月均收入、房产拥有情况、私家车拥有情况、人均居住面积和居住楼层;父母亲4个SES变量包括母亲文化程度、父亲文化程度、母亲月均收入和父亲月均收入;母亲4个SES变量包括母亲文化程度、母亲月均收入、人均居住面积和居住楼层;父亲4个SES变量包括父亲文化程度、父亲月均收入、人均居住面积和居住楼层。 -
[1] Ng SK, Cameron CM, Hills AP, et al. Socioeconomic disparities in prepregnancy BMI and impact on maternal and neonatal outcomes and postpartum weight retention: the EFHL longitudinal birth cohort study[J]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2014, 14(1): 314. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-314 [2] Blumenshine P, Egerter S, Barclay CJ, et al. Socioeconomic dispa-rities in adverse birth outcomes: a systematic review[J]. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2010, 39(3): 263 – 272. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.05.012 [3] 任春荣. 学生家庭社会经济地位(SES)的测量技术[J]. 教育学报, 2010, 6(5): 77 – 82. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1298.2010.05.012 [4] Duncan GJ, Daly MC, McDonough P, et al. Optimal indicators of socioeconomic status for health research[J]. American Journal of Public Health, 2002, 92(7): 1151 – 1157. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.92.7.1151 [5] Ganzeboom HBG, Treiman DJ. Internationally comparable mea-sures of occupational status for the 1988 international standard classification of occupations[J]. Social Science Research, 1996, 25(3): 201 – 239. doi: 10.1006/ssre.1996.0010 [6] Vyas S, Kumaranayake L. Constructing socio-economic status indices: how to use principal components analysis[J]. Health Policy and Planning, 2006, 21(6): 459 – 468. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czl029 [7] 王思平, 王娟. 社会经济地位评价方法及与卒中关系的研究进展[J]. 中国脑血管病杂志, 2016, 13(11): 610 – 613. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5921.2016.11.011 [8] Qiu X, Lu JH, He JR, et al. The born in Guangzhou cohort study (BIGCS)[J]. European Journal of Epidemiology, 2017, 32(4): 337 – 346. doi: 10.1007/s10654-017-0239-x [9] Wei DM, Au Yeung SL, He JR, et al. The role of social support in family socio-economic disparities in depressive symptoms during early pregnancy: evidence from a Chinese birth cohort[J]. Journal of Affective Disorders, 2018, 238: 418 – 423. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.06.014 [10] Galobardes B, Shaw M, Lawlor DA, et al. Indicators of socioe-conomic position (part 2)[J]. Journal of Epidemiology and Com-munity Health, 2006, 60(2): 95 – 101. doi: 10.1136/jech.2004.028092 [11] 刘梅, 李灵清, 普世传. 2018年云南省居民健康素养水平及影响因素分析[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2020, 36(8): 1242 – 1246. doi: 10.11847/zgggws1123815 [12] 翟炳哲, 张杰, 毛其智, 等. 城市高层住宅楼层偏好的实证研究 —— 基于石家庄的城市居民调查[J]. 住区, 2014(3): 140 – 146. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9073.2014.03.023 [13] 黄洁萍. 社会经济地位对健康的影响机理分析[M]. 北京: 经济科学出版社, 2014. [14] Galobardes B, Shaw M, Lawlor DA, et al. Indicators of socioe-conomic position (part 1)[J]. Journal of Epidemiology and Com-munity Health, 2006, 60(1): 7 – 12. doi: 10.1136/jech.2004.023531 [15] 国家职业分类大典修订工作委员会. 中华人民共和国职业分类大典(2015年版)[M]. 北京: 中国劳动社会保障出版社, 2015. [16] 李春玲. 当代中国社会的声望分层 —— 职业声望与社会经济地位指数测量[J]. 社会学研究, 2005(2): 74 – 102. [17] 胡蕊, 朱文丽, 冯翠玲, 等. 孕妇膳食模式建立及其相关因素[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2015, 31(11): 1457 – 1459. doi: 10.11847/zgggws2015-31-11-27 [18] Tu S, Wang AL, Tan MZ, et al. Family socioeconomic position and abnormal birth weight: evidence from a Chinese birth cohort[J]. World Journal of Pediatrics, 2019, 15(5): 483 – 491. doi: 10.1007/s12519-019-00279-7