高级检索
崔牛牛, 张雅璐, 陈佳鹏, 张蕾. 农村贫困老年白内障患者就诊情况与自评治疗效果关联性分析[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2022, 38(4): 385-389. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1135146
引用本文: 崔牛牛, 张雅璐, 陈佳鹏, 张蕾. 农村贫困老年白内障患者就诊情况与自评治疗效果关联性分析[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2022, 38(4): 385-389. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1135146
CUI Niu-niu, ZHANG Ya-lu, CHEN Jia-peng, . Correlation between hospital visit and self-rated treatment effect among rural poor elderly cataract patients[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2022, 38(4): 385-389. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1135146
Citation: CUI Niu-niu, ZHANG Ya-lu, CHEN Jia-peng, . Correlation between hospital visit and self-rated treatment effect among rural poor elderly cataract patients[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2022, 38(4): 385-389. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1135146

农村贫困老年白内障患者就诊情况与自评治疗效果关联性分析

Correlation between hospital visit and self-rated treatment effect among rural poor elderly cataract patients

  • 摘要:
      目的  了解农村贫困老年白内障患者就诊情况,分析其与自评治疗效果的关系。
      方法  利用健康扶贫动态管理系统数据,抽取23 859名在2017 — 2019年3年内被确诊白内障的 ≥ 60岁农村建档立卡贫困老年人,采用描述性分析和多分类logistic回归分析方法对其就诊情况与自评治疗效果进行关联性分析。
      结果  23 859名农村贫困老年白内障患者中,自评治疗效果好转和治愈率为90.0 %。有59.7 % 的患者于二级医院就诊,有79.9 % 的患者在县域内诊疗机构就诊;3年间80.9 % 的患者仅接受过1次白内障诊治。多因素回归分析结果显示,在一级医院(OR = 1.242,95 % CI = 1.137~1.357)、二级医院(OR = 1.362,95 % CI = 1.270~1.460)就诊的患者较在三级医院就诊的患者自评治疗效果更好,在基层医疗机构就诊的患者(OR = 0.516,95 % CI = 0.461~0.578)自评治疗效果则较差,在县域外医院就诊(OR = 1.458,95 % CI = 1.364~1.557)、2017 — 2019年3年内仅接受过1次白内障诊治的患者(OR = 1.458,95 % CI = 1.364~1.557)自评治疗效果较好。
      结论  2017 — 2019年农村贫困老年白内障患者救治后的好转率较高,其就诊情况与自评治疗效果密切相关。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective   To examine the situation of hospital visits and its association with self-rated treatment effect among poor elderly cataract patients in rural China.
      Methods   From annual database (2017 – 2019) of national system for dynamic management on rural health poverty alleviation, we extracted the information on 23 859 poor elderly (aged 60 years and above) with diagnosed cataract. Descriptive analysis and multi-category logistic regression analysis were conducted to explore the correlation between hospital visit and self-rated treatment effect among the participants.
      Results   Self-assessed cure or improvement of cataract after medication were reported by 90.0% of the participants. Of all the participants, 59.7% and 79.9% had their medication for cataract at secondary hospitals and at county-level medical institutions; 80.9% had only one hospital visit for cataract medication during the period of 2017 – 2019. The results of multivariate regression analysis showed that compared to those seeking medication at tertiary hospitals, the participants seeking medication at first-level hospital (odds ratio OR = 1.242, 95% confidence interval CI: 1.137 – 1.357) and second-level hospital (OR = 1.362, 95% CI: 1.270 – 1.460) were more likely to have a better self-rated treatment effect; while, the participants seeking medication at primary medical institutions were more likely to have a poor self-rated treatment effect (OR = 0.516, 95% CI: 0.461 – 0.578); the results also demonstrated that the participants with following characteristics were more likely to have a better self-rated treatment effect: seeking medication at hospitals outside of home county (OR = 1.458, 95% CI: 1.364 – 1.557) and having only one hospital visit for cataract medication during the three-year period (OR = 1.458, 95% CI: 1.364 – 1.557).
      Conclusion   For the period of 2017 to 2019, the self-rated disease improvement after medication is high and the treatment effect is closely related to seeking medication in hospitals at different levels among poor elderly cataract patients in rural China.

     

/

返回文章
返回