高级检索
李蕾, 胡芳芳, 杨海峰, 李梦华, 唐文龙, 陈晨辉, 徐凌忠, 李印龙. 泰安市老年人失能现状城乡差异及影响因素分析[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2023, 39(8): 976-981. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1140818
引用本文: 李蕾, 胡芳芳, 杨海峰, 李梦华, 唐文龙, 陈晨辉, 徐凌忠, 李印龙. 泰安市老年人失能现状城乡差异及影响因素分析[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2023, 39(8): 976-981. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1140818
shu
LI Lei, HU Fangfang, YANG Haifeng, LI Menghua, TANG Wenlong, CHEN Chenhui, XU Lingzhong, LI Yinlong. Urban-rural disparity in disability and its influencing factors among the elderly in Tai′an city[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2023, 39(8): 976-981. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1140818
Citation: LI Lei, HU Fangfang, YANG Haifeng, LI Menghua, TANG Wenlong, CHEN Chenhui, XU Lingzhong, LI Yinlong. Urban-rural disparity in disability and its influencing factors among the elderly in Tai′an city[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2023, 39(8): 976-981. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1140818
shu

泰安市老年人失能现状城乡差异及影响因素分析

Urban-rural disparity in disability and its influencing factors among the elderly in Tai′an city

    摘要
  • 摘要:
      目的  了解山东省泰安市城乡老年人失能现状及其影响因素，为改善城乡老年人失能状况提供科学依据，以期促进健康老龄化建设。
      方法  采用多阶段整群随机抽样方法，于2020年7 — 8月对泰安市6个县（市/区）3896名 ≥ 60岁老年人进行调查，分析城乡老年人日常生活自理能力（ADL）现状及其影响因素。
      结果  泰安市老年人失能率为4.8%，其中农村老年人失能率（5.5%）高于城镇老年人（3.5%）（χ2 = 8.040，P < 0.05）。多因素logistic回归分析结果显示，年龄 ≥ 80岁（OR = 7.058）、自评健康状况差（OR = 3.237）、睡眠质量差（OR = 6.288）是城镇老年人失能的危险因素，参加城镇职工基本医疗保险（OR = 0.146）或城乡居民基本医疗保险（OR = 0.180）是城镇老年人失能的保护因素。年龄70～79岁（OR = 2.116）或 ≥ 80岁（OR = 7.270）、自评健康状况一般（OR = 2.256）或差（OR = 4.368）、患有慢性病（OR = 3.290）、过去一年曾跌倒（OR = 2.151）是农村老年人失能的危险因素，参加体育锻炼（OR = 0.568）是农村老年人失能的保护因素。
      结论  泰安市农村老年人失能率高于城镇老年人，年龄、自评健康状况是该地区城镇和农村老年人失能的共同影响因素。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective  To examine current situation and influencing factors of disability among urban and rural elderly residents in Tai'an municipality, and to provide evidence for promoting healthy aging in the population.
      Methods   Face-to-face interviews were conducted among 3 896 elderly residents ( ≥ 60 years) recruited with multistage random cluster sampling in 6 prefectures/counties/districts of Tai′an municipality, Shandong province during July – August 2020. The Physical Self-Maintenance Scale (PSMS) for activities of daily living (ADL) assessment, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) for sleep status evaluation, and a self-designed general questionnaire were adopted in the survey for analyzing ADL and its associates of the elderly.
      Results   Of the 3 864 elderly averagely aged 68.89 ± 5.98 years, 4.8% were assessed as having disabilities (with a PSMS score of higher than 6), with a significantly higher disability ratio among the rural elderly than that among the urban elderly (5.5% vs. 3.5%, χ2 = 8.040; P < 0.05). The results of multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed following significant influencing factors of disability: (1) risk factors for urban elderly: aged ≥ 80 years (odds ratio OR = 7.058), poor self-rated health (OR = 3.237), and poor sleep quality (OR = 6.288); (2) protective factors for urban elderly: participating in the basic medical insurance for urban employees (OR = 0.146) or the basic medical insurance for urban and rural residents (OR = 0.180); (3) risk factors for rural elderly: aged 70 – 79 years (OR = 2.116) or ≥ 80 years (OR = 7.270), fair self-rated health (OR = 2.256) or poor self-rated health (OR = 4.368), suffering from chronic diseases (OR = 3.290), falling history in the previous year (OR = 2.151); and (4) protective factors for rural elderly: participating in physical exercise (OR = 0.568).
      Conclusion  The prevalence of disability was higher among rural elderly residents than that among urban elderly residents and the prevalence was influenced by age and self-rated health for both rural and urban elderly in Tai′an municipality.

     

    • HTML全文
    • 参考文献(38)
    • 相关文章
    • 施引文献
  • 资源附件(0)

/

返回文章
返回