高级检索
王凤兰, 刘艳, 张荔彦, 徐锐. 不同分析方法测定尿铅的比较[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2000, 16(2): 184-184. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2000-16-02-75
引用本文: 王凤兰, 刘艳, 张荔彦, 徐锐. 不同分析方法测定尿铅的比较[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2000, 16(2): 184-184. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2000-16-02-75
Wang Fenglan, . Comparative Study on Determination of Uric Lead By Different Methods[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2000, 16(2): 184-184. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2000-16-02-75
Citation: Wang Fenglan, . Comparative Study on Determination of Uric Lead By Different Methods[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2000, 16(2): 184-184. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2000-16-02-75

不同分析方法测定尿铅的比较

Comparative Study on Determination of Uric Lead By Different Methods

  • 摘要: 尿铅的测定是铅作业工人生物监测及职业病中毒诊断的重要指标之一.测定尿铅一般采用二硫腙比色法和原子吸收法.

     

    Abstract: We measured the level of uric lead in workers exposured and nonex posured lead by DPSA,GFAAS and DCM.The basic parameters of the three methods demonstrated that sensitivity and precision of DPSA and GFAAS excelled that of DCM,but the linear range of DPSA and GFAAS are more narrow than that of DCM. All of The three methods had excellent accuracy(paired t-test P>0.05).The results showed the different of the three methods no significant.

     

/

返回文章
返回