高级检索
贺佳, 贺宪民, 高尔生, 楼超华. 生殖健康综合评价模型的研究[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2002, 18(1): 115-117. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2002-18-01-68
引用本文: 贺佳, 贺宪民, 高尔生, 楼超华. 生殖健康综合评价模型的研究[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2002, 18(1): 115-117. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2002-18-01-68
HE Jia, . Study on Comprehensive Evaluation on Reproductive Health[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2002, 18(1): 115-117. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2002-18-01-68
Citation: HE Jia, . Study on Comprehensive Evaluation on Reproductive Health[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2002, 18(1): 115-117. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2002-18-01-68

生殖健康综合评价模型的研究

Study on Comprehensive Evaluation on Reproductive Health

  • 摘要: 目的对全国30个省市生殖健康状况及保健水平进行综合评价.方法应用4种综合评价方法:专家咨询权数评价法、因子分析评价法、信息量权数评价法和独立性权数评价法.结果建立了研究生殖健康状况及保健水平的综合评价方法.分析了4种综合评价方法所得结果之间的关系,计算了各地区生殖健康状况及保健水平的综合评价得分,将全国30个省市划分为5类地区.结论经过对本研究建立的综合评价方法进行前瞻性与回顾性验证,表明该方法稳定、可靠.适用于生殖健康状况及保健水平的综合评价.

     

    Abstract: ObjectiveTo evaluate synthetically the reproductive health status and care level among 30 provinces and megalopolises in our country.MethodsTo apply four methods to evaluate the status of reproductive health.They are(1)expert-consultion weight evaluation,(2)factor analysis evaluation,(3)information weight evaluation,(4)independibility weight evaluation.ResultsTo build the methods of evaluating comprehensively reproductive health status and care level,to analyze the relationship between the four methods,to calculate the scores of reproductive health every district,to divide the districts of our country into 5 grades.ConclusionThe retrospective and prospective examinations are used to evaluate the comprehensive evaluating methods.The results show that the mothods are stable and credible,and can be used well in practice.

     

/

返回文章
返回