高级检索
刘翔, 姚婕, 叶冬青. 不同干预频次对降低中学生吸烟率效果分析[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2007, 23(7): 794-795. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2007-23-07-13
引用本文: 刘翔, 姚婕, 叶冬青. 不同干预频次对降低中学生吸烟率效果分析[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2007, 23(7): 794-795. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2007-23-07-13
LIU Xiang, YAO Jie, YE Dong-qing. Effects of intervention of different frequency on decreasing smoking prevalence among junior high school students[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2007, 23(7): 794-795. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2007-23-07-13
Citation: LIU Xiang, YAO Jie, YE Dong-qing. Effects of intervention of different frequency on decreasing smoking prevalence among junior high school students[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2007, 23(7): 794-795. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2007-23-07-13

不同干预频次对降低中学生吸烟率效果分析

Effects of intervention of different frequency on decreasing smoking prevalence among junior high school students

  • 摘要: 目的 评价基于学校的青少年吸烟干预计划对降低初中生吸烟率的干预效应,探索不同次数干预的效应差异。方法 将25所初中学校随机分为3组,分别为对照组、1次干预组和3次干预组。每所学校的初中一年级学生均为研究对象。在每次干预后6个月时对3组进行一次问卷调查。结果 1次干预组在干预后一年半时的吸烟率显著低于对照组(OR=0.56,95%CI=0.33~0.87);3次干预组在第2次干预后(OR=0.32,95%CI=0.15~0.63)和第3次干预后(OR=0.27,95%CI=0.13~0.48)吸烟率均显著低于对照组。同时发现,在第3次干预后3次干预组的吸烟率显著低于1次干预组(OR=0.48,95%CI=0.28~0.81)。结论 本研究所实施的干预能有效地降低初中生吸烟率,且3次干预的效应强于1次干预。

     

    Abstract: Objective To evaluate the effects of a school-based smoking intervention among adolescents injunior high schools,and to explore the difference in effects of once and multi-inter vention.Methods Twenty-five junior high schools were rando mlyassigned into three groups,which were control group,once-intervention group and three-times inter vention group respectively.All students from the seventh grade of each school were subjects.Every six months after each inter vention there was a questionnaire investigation carried out among the three groups.Results One and half years after intervention,the smoking prevalence of once-intervention group was significantly lower than the control group(OR=0.56,95%CI=0.33~0.87).After the second(OR=0.32,95%CI=0.15~0.63)and third intervention(OR=0.27,95%CI=0.13~0.48).There were fewer smokers in three-times intervention group than the control group.Meanw hile,the smoking prevalence in after the three-time intervention group was found significantly lower than that of once-inter vention group third intervention(OR=0.48,95%CI=0.28~0.81).Conclusion The intervention deliver ed in the study was effective on reducing to-bacco use among students injunior high schools and the effect of three-times intervention on decreasing smoking prevalence was stronger than once-inter vention.

     

/

返回文章
返回