高级检索
王晓敏, 杨莉, 张海英, 刘勇, 唐峥华, 王剑, 郑艳燕, 董爱虎. 驾驶员A型行为及个性特征与事故倾向性关系[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2012, 28(3): 282-284. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2012-28-03-11
引用本文: 王晓敏, 杨莉, 张海英, 刘勇, 唐峥华, 王剑, 郑艳燕, 董爱虎. 驾驶员A型行为及个性特征与事故倾向性关系[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2012, 28(3): 282-284. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2012-28-03-11
WANG Xiao-min, YANG Li, ZHANG Hai-ying, . Association of type-A behavior and personality with accident proneness among drivers[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2012, 28(3): 282-284. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2012-28-03-11
Citation: WANG Xiao-min, YANG Li, ZHANG Hai-ying, . Association of type-A behavior and personality with accident proneness among drivers[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2012, 28(3): 282-284. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2012-28-03-11

驾驶员A型行为及个性特征与事故倾向性关系

Association of type-A behavior and personality with accident proneness among drivers

  • 摘要: 目的 探讨驾驶员A型行为及个性特征与其事故倾向性的关系,为减少交通事故的发生提供参考依据.方法 采用1:1配对病例对照研究方法对在广西南宁市抽取的46对事故组和对照组驾驶员进行问卷调查.结果 事故组驾驶员时间紧迫感(TH)、A型行为(TH+CH)、精神质(P)和情绪性(N)因子得分分别为(13.22±3.91)、(25.63±6.17)、(6.93±3.31)和(9.83±5.91)分,均高于对照组的(11.54±3.68)、(23.04±5.67)、(5.07±2.70)和(7.26±3.40)分(P<0.05);掩饰性(L)因子得分为(12.17±3.99)分,低于对照组的(13.61±3.44)分(t=-2.08,P=0.04);事故组驾龄≤15年驾驶员TH、争强好胜和缺乏耐性(CH)、A型行为、P、N因子得分分别为(13.67±3.85)、(12.73±2.83)、(26.39±6.06)、(7.03±3.04)和(10.42±6.11)分,均高于对照组的(11.16±3.53)、(11.09±2.88)、(22.25±5.61)、(5.00±2.49)和(7.44±3.47)分(P<0.05);L因子得分为(11.91±4.05)分,低于对照组的(13.75±3.09)分(t=-2.05,P<0.05);单因素Logistic回归分析结果表明,内外向(OR=1.21)和精神质(OR=1.26)是驾驶员事故倾向性的危险因素;事故组驾驶员A型行为类型评定量表中TH、CH因子得分与艾森克个性问卷中N、P因子得分均呈正相关关系(P<0.01),与L因子得分均呈负相关关系(P<0.01).结论 驾驶员A型行为及个性特征与其事故倾向性有关;个性内外向和精神质是驾驶员事故倾向性的危险因素.

     

    Abstract: Objective To assess the association of type-A behavior and personality with accident proneness among drivers and to provide evidence for reducing traffic accidents.Methods With 1:1 matched case-control study,46 pairs of drivers from Nanning,Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region completed type-A behavior questionnaire and Eysenck Personality Questionnaire(EPQ) scale.Results The score of time urgency(TH),type A behavior(TABS),mental quality(P),and emotional(N) were 13.22±3.91,25.63±6.17,6.93±3.31,and 9.83±5.91,respectively,and were significantly higher in the case group than in the control group(11.54±3.68,23.04±5.67,5.07±2.70,and 7.26±3.40)(P < 0.05 for all).The lie score(L)(12.17±3.99) for case group was lower than the control group(13.61±3.44)(t=-2.08,P < 0.05).TH,CH,TABS,P,and N of the drivers with 15 years driving experience or more in the case group were 13.67±3.85,12.73±2.83,26.39±6.06,7.03±3.04,and 10.42±6.11 and significantly higher than those of the control group(11.16±3.53,11.09±2.88,22.25±5.61,5.00±2.49,and 7.44±3.47)(P < 0.05 for all),but the L score(11.91±4.05) was lower than that of the control group(13.75±3.09)(P < 0.05).The results of univariate logistic regression analysis showed that internal and external personality(odds ratioOR=1.2) and mental quality(OR=1.26) were risk factors for driver accident proneness.Among the drivers in the case group,there were a significant positive correlation between the score of TABS and P or N score of EPQ(P < 0.01) and a significant negative correlation of TABS with L score(P < 0.01).Conclusion The driver accident proneness has relation to type-A behavior and the personality.Both internal and external personality and mental quality are risk factors for driver accident proneness.

     

/

返回文章
返回