高级检索
孙燕鸣, 李桂英, 贺淑芳, 岳海, 范思雄, 卢红艳. 北京市男男性行为者入群原因及其相关特点分析[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2015, 31(12): 1530-1535. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2015-31-12-03
引用本文: 孙燕鸣, 李桂英, 贺淑芳, 岳海, 范思雄, 卢红艳. 北京市男男性行为者入群原因及其相关特点分析[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2015, 31(12): 1530-1535. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2015-31-12-03
SUN Yan-ming, LI Gui-ying, HE Shu-fang.et al, . Motivations for homosexual behavior and their related characteristics of MSM in Beijing[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2015, 31(12): 1530-1535. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2015-31-12-03
Citation: SUN Yan-ming, LI Gui-ying, HE Shu-fang.et al, . Motivations for homosexual behavior and their related characteristics of MSM in Beijing[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2015, 31(12): 1530-1535. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2015-31-12-03

北京市男男性行为者入群原因及其相关特点分析

Motivations for homosexual behavior and their related characteristics of MSM in Beijing

  • 摘要: 目的 了解北京市男男性行为者(MSM)入群原因构成,分析其与人口学、行为学及艾滋病病毒(HIV)感染率等的关系,对未来防艾干预工作和社会宣传的开展提供依据。方法 采用同伴推动抽样法(RDS)进行横断面调查,通过问卷收集社会人口学、成为MSM的原因、HIV感染高危行为等信息,并采集血液进行HIV检测。结果 在调查的600名MSM中,成为MSM的原因为好奇者201人(33.5%)、天生者393人(65.5%)、其他6人(1.0%),平均年龄为(32.8±9.2)岁;天生组未婚比例(74.8%)高于好奇组(60.2%)(χ2=16.113,P=0.000);在文化程度和收入水平上,天生组均优于好奇组(均P<0.01);在性取向上,好奇组MSM中双性性取向比例(52.7%)高于天生组(19.6%)(χ2=68.529,P=0.000);在肛交性行为上,好奇组做1(38.9%)比例大于天生组(30.6%)(χ2=10.415,P=0.005),而有固定肛交性伴的比例(62.5%)低于天生组(71.2%)(χ2=4.249,P=0.039);好奇组77.6%的MSM曾经与女性发生过性行为,高于天生组的38.4%(χ2=81.789,P=0.000);在政策知识上,好奇组均较天生组差(均P<0.05),对于HIV免费检测地点的知晓程度也低于天生组(P<0.05);好奇组的HIV感染率(14.4%)高于天生组(8.1%)(χ2=5.701,P=0.017)。结论 不同原因成为MSM者在HIV传播风险上作用大小不同,因好奇成为MSM者社会地位较低,安全意识较弱,HIV感染率更高,HIV传播的桥梁作用更为明显。

     

    Abstract: Objective To examine different motivations for homosexual behavior and their associations with demographics,sexual behavior,and human immunodeficiency virus(HIV) infection of men who have sex with men(MSM) in Beijing.Methods With respondent-driven sampling(RDS),600 MSM living in Beijing were surveyed face-to-face with a questionnaire on demography,reasons for engaged in homosexual activity,and HIV infection related behaviors.Blood samples of the MSM were collected for HIV detection.Results Of all the MSM,65.5%(393,named innateness group) attributed their involvement in homosexual activity to innate tendency,33.5%(201,named curiosity group) to curiosity,and only 6(1.0%) to other motivations.The average age of the MSM was 32.8±9.2 years,and the average age of MSM of innateness group was significantly younger than that of curiosity group(P<0.05).The proportion of being unmarried was higher in innateness group than in curiosity group(74.8% vs.60.2%,P<0.05).The MSM of innateness group reported a higher education level than the curiosity group(P<0.05).The curiosity group reported a significantly higher ratio of bisexual behavior than innateness group(52.7% vs.19.6%,P<0.05).There were 38.9% of the MSM in curiosity group reporting the preference of having insertive anal sex,significantly higher that in innateness group(30.6%)(P<0.05),whereas,there were 71.2% of the MSM of innateness group reporting the preference of having a regular sexual partner,higher than those of curiosity group(62.5%).The proportion of having sex with females was significantly higher in the curiosity group than that in the innateness group(77.6% vs.38.4%,P<0.05).The MSM of curiosity group knew less AIDS related policy and knowledge and the sites of HIV voluntary counseling and testing than those of innateness group(all P<0.05),but the HIV positve rate was significantly higher in the MSM of curiosity group than those of innateness group(14.4% vs.8.1%,P<0.05).Conclusion Different motivations for the involvement in homosexual activity have different impacts on the risk of HIV transmission among MSM.The MSM of curiosity group,which have lower social status,poorer knowledge about safety sex,and higher HIV infection rates,may play an important role in the transmission of HIV.

     

/

返回文章
返回