高级检索
于佳明, 王亚洲, 王芳, 高倩, 李发明, 华慧, 陈仁彤, 关雨沅, 刘扬. 西昌和绍兴眼紫外线暴露强度差异比较[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2017, 33(4): 588-591. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2017-33-04-18
引用本文: 于佳明, 王亚洲, 王芳, 高倩, 李发明, 华慧, 陈仁彤, 关雨沅, 刘扬. 西昌和绍兴眼紫外线暴露强度差异比较[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2017, 33(4): 588-591. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2017-33-04-18
YU Jia-ming, WANG Ya-zhou, WANG Fang.et al, . Difference in ocular ultraviolet exposure intensity betweem Xichang and Shaoxing city[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2017, 33(4): 588-591. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2017-33-04-18
Citation: YU Jia-ming, WANG Ya-zhou, WANG Fang.et al, . Difference in ocular ultraviolet exposure intensity betweem Xichang and Shaoxing city[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2017, 33(4): 588-591. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2017-33-04-18

西昌和绍兴眼紫外线暴露强度差异比较

Difference in ocular ultraviolet exposure intensity betweem Xichang and Shaoxing city

  • 摘要: 目的 了解不同海拔的西昌和绍兴地区眼紫外线暴露强度的日间分布及随太阳高度角变化的差异。方法 采用自行研制的眼紫外线暴露模型,在晴好天气下,分别在西昌和绍兴地区进行监测。监测的数据运用AvaSoft 7.4 for USB2 软件和 OriginPro 8 软件进行数据处理和分析。结果 最大暴露状态下,西昌和绍兴地区眼紫外线A段(UVA)和紫外线B段(UVB)日间分布均呈双峰型,峰值UVA分别为2 181.91 μW/cm2和2 003.6 μW/cm2;UVB分别为117.2 μW/cm2和72 μW/cm2;眼部和环境暴露比表明,在最大暴露状态下,西昌和绍兴地区UVA基本相近,分别为0.79和0.80,而UVB西昌大于绍兴,分别为0.68和0.55。结论 西昌和绍兴地区眼部UVA与UVB最大暴露强度的日间变化呈双峰型分布;相同太阳高度角下,眼部UVB暴露强度西昌高于绍兴,眼部UVB与环境UVB暴露比西昌亦大于绍兴。

     

    Abstract: Objective To explore the difference in intensities of ocular exposure to ultraviolet (UV) irradiance in diurnal distribution and at different solar elevation angle (SEA) between Xichang and Shaoxing city at different altitude.Methods A self-designed rotating manikin and dual-detector spectrometer were used to monitor the intensity of ocular exposure to UV irradiation under clear sky in Xichang and Shaoxing city.Monitoring data were processed and analyzed with AvaSoft 7.4 USB2 software and OriginPro 8 software.Results In maximum exposure,both the ocular ultraviolet radiation A (UVA) and ultraviolet radiation B (UVB) diurnal variations exhibited bimodal distribution in Xichang and Shaoxing city;the maximum values of UVA were 2 181.91μW/cm2 and 2 003.6μW/cm2;and those of UVB were 117.2 μW/cm2 and 72 μW/cm2,respectively.As for the ratio of ocular to ambient exposure,the study results revealed that the ratio was almost the same in two areas for UVA maximum exposure (0.79 and 0.80);but for the UVB maximum exposure,the exposure ratio of Xichang is higher than that of Shaoxing (0.68 vs.0.55).Conclusion The maximum ocular UVA and UVB exposure exhibit bimodal diurnal distribution in Xichang and Shaoxing city.Under the same solar elevation angle,the intensity of ocular exposure to UVB irradiance in Xichang is higher than that in Shaoxing,the ratio of ocular to ambient UVB exposure in Xichang was higher than that in Shaoxing.

     

/

返回文章
返回