高级检索
时勘, 李文东, 乐国安, 王永丽, 李毓秋, 周洁, 陈中永, 井世洁, 鲁中义. 华北5城市民众SARS疫情中心理行为研究[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2003, 19(9): 1025-1027.
引用本文: 时勘, 李文东, 乐国安, 王永丽, 李毓秋, 周洁, 陈中永, 井世洁, 鲁中义. 华北5城市民众SARS疫情中心理行为研究[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2003, 19(9): 1025-1027.
SHI Kan, LI Wen-dong, LE Guo-an, . Study on psychological behaviors of people in 5 cities of North China under SARS situation[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2003, 19(9): 1025-1027.
Citation: SHI Kan, LI Wen-dong, LE Guo-an, . Study on psychological behaviors of people in 5 cities of North China under SARS situation[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2003, 19(9): 1025-1027.

华北5城市民众SARS疫情中心理行为研究

Study on psychological behaviors of people in 5 cities of North China under SARS situation

  • 摘要:
      目的   考察华北5城市民众在SARS疫情中的风险认知特征, 探讨风险认知对应对行为、心理健康水平的影响作用, 建立社会心理预警模型, 为政府决策和舆论导向提供心理学依据和对策建议。
      方法   采用分层抽样和方便抽样相结合的方法, 对北京、天津、石家庄、呼和浩特和太原市市民1500人进行问卷调查。
      结果   (1) 空间距离近的疫情信息更能引起民众的关注, 北京市民对SARS患病信息和治愈信息敏感性显著高于邻近城市。(2)女性表现出更高的风险感, 政府公众信息更能引起中、老年市民的关注, 20岁以下的青少年更重视与自己学习、生活相关的信息, 50岁以上民众对于"愈后对于身体有无影响”等信息的警觉性显著高于其他年龄组。(3)与北京邻近的城市市民对SARS疫情的风险评估明显低于北京市民, 某些地区大学生的心理问题值得关注。
      结论   在突发事件中, 通过风险认知特征调查, 可以了解人们的风险认知差别及其对不同人群的应对行为、心理健康水平的影响; 今后应加强公共卫生突发事件中民众社会心理行为的预测研究。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective   Exploring people's characteristics of risk perception under SARS situation, finding out how risk perception affects behavior and mental health, offering helpful research result for the related governmental department and for the public, offering psychological evidence and coping strategies.
      Methods   By stratified sampling and convenient sampling, survey of 1500 people is taken in Beijing, Tianjin, Shijiazhuang and Huhehaote.People's risk perception, degree of tension, prediction about when SARA would be controlled, mental health, coping behavior and prediction about the economic development are explored by Likert Scale and GHQ.
      Results   (1) SARS information from nearby place can draw more attention, urban people in Beijing were more sensitive to infection and recovery information than those in nearby cities.(2)Female fell more risk, government and public information are drawn more attention by middle and elder people, youth under 20 pay more attention to information related to their study and life, and people above 50 were more sensitive to recovery information than other groups.(3)Risk assessment of people near Beijing were significantly lower than that of people in Beijing, and college student's mental health should be paid more attention in some place.
      Conclusion   It can be understood that the difference of people's risk perception and its effect on different coping behavior and mental health of different groups by taking survey of people in emergency.The research of people's social-psychological behavior should be improved in public emergency.

     

/

返回文章
返回