Government predominance in maternal health care financing in Beijing and Shanghai: a comparison analysis

MA Dong-ping; YIN Wen-qiang; SHI Lin-mei

doi:10.11847/zgggws1122655

Volume 38 Issue 1

Jan. 2022

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Chinese Journal of Public Health > 2022 > 38(1): 118-121

MA Dong-ping, YIN Wen-qiang, SHI Lin-mei, . Government predominance in maternal health care financing in Beijing and Shanghai: a comparison analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2022, 38(1): 118-121. doi: 10.11847/zgggws1122655

Citation:

MA Dong-ping, YIN Wen-qiang, SHI Lin-mei, . Government predominance in maternal health care financing in Beijing and Shanghai: a comparison analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2022, 38(1): 118-121. doi: 10.11847/zgggws1122655

Citation:

PDF( 617 KB)

Government predominance in maternal health care financing in Beijing and Shanghai: a comparison analysis

doi: 10.11847/zgggws1122655

MA Dong-ping^{1, 2, 3},
YIN Wen-qiang^{1, 2, 3
,
,},
SHI Lin-mei^{3, 4},

1.
School of Public Health and Management, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, Shandong Province 261053, China

More Information

Corresponding author: YIN Wenqiang, E-mail: yinwq1969@126.com
Received Date: 2019-01-04
Available Online: 2021-11-16
Publish Date: 2022-01-20

Abstract

Abstract

Objective To examine changing trend and regional disparity in the insufficiency of government predominance in maternal health care financing and the maternal mortality ratio (MMR) in Beijing and Shanghai during 2000 to 2017 for exploring a rational government predominance in maternal health care financing. Methods Documents and literatures about maternal health care financing in Beijing and Shanghai published from 1995 through 2017 were searched; from which, the information on government predominance financing was extracted and the insufficiency of government predominance in maternal health care financing was evaluated with a severity score. Spearman correlation and linear regression analysis were used to analyze the relationship between the insufficiency of government predominance financing and MMR in the two municipalities. Results The severity score for the insufficiency of government predominance in maternal health care financing decreased from 3.58 in 2000 to 2.82 in 2017 in Beijing municipality; while in Shanghai the severity score decreased from 3.72 to 1.44. A significant correlation between the MMR and the severity score was observed in Shanghai municipality (r = 0.723, P < 0.01). Conclusion The government predominance in maternal health care financing increased during 2000 – 2017 in Beijing and Shanghai municipality and the government predominance financing has a more obvious influence on the reduction of maternal mortality ratio in Shanghai municipality.
- maternal health care,
- government predominance,
- severity score,
- Beijing,
- Shanghai

FullText(HTML)

References(22)

References

[1]	赵宁, 申俊龙, 赵琨, 等. 公共财政视角下的我国西部地区妇幼卫生投入状况[J]. 中国卫生政策研究, 2013, 6(3): 56 – 60. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-2982.2013.03.011
[2]	陈子敏, 涂忆桥, 胡祖斌, 等. 政府对妇幼卫生投入状况分析[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2005, 20(23): 3047 – 3049. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4411.2005.23.001
[3]	荆丽梅, 金春林, 丁汉升, 等. 上海市公共卫生机构收入与支出分析[J]. 中国卫生政策研究, 2010, 3(1): 10 – 14. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-2982.2010.01.004
[4]	田文华, 梁鸿. 卫生投入与卫生事业发展: 从社会效率与目标考察[J]. 社会科学, 2002(1): 50 – 54.
[5]	吴天. 公共财政框架下的卫生筹资机制研究 —— 从分析江苏省卫生总费用情况入手[J]. 卫生经济研究, 2011(10): 35 – 37. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-7778.2011.10.013
[6]	姚岚, 舒展, 陈子敏, 等. 对公共卫生投入的逻辑思考[J]. 中国初级卫生保健, 2004, 18(11): 1 – 2. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-568X.2004.11.001
[7]	冷志伟. 公共财政下我国妇幼卫生投入状况及其影响研究[D]. 济南: 山东大学, 2008.
[8]	北京市卫生和计划生育委员会. 北京卫生计生事业统计公报[EB/OL]. [2018 – 05 – 03]. http://xxzx.bjchfp.gov.cn/tonjixinxi/weishengtongjigongbao/.
[9]	上海市卫生和计划生育委员会. 上海卫生计生数据[EB/OL]. [2018 – 05 – 03]. http://www.wsjsw.gov.cn/wsj/n429/n432/n1488/n1490/index.html.
[10]	麻若鹏, 金春林, 宋耀君, 等. 突发公共卫生事件应急经费保障特点及影响因素分析[J]. 中国社会医学杂志, 2010, 27(6): 378 – 379.
[11]	徐伟, 曹晶晶. 我国个人现金卫生支出比例影响因素的实证分析[J]. 江苏社会科学, 2013(1): 89 – 93. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-8671.2013.01.013
[12]	王祺. 新形势下加大公共卫生财政投入的重要性及对策分析[J]. 经济师, 2018(5): 26 – 27. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-4914.2018.05.009
[13]	唐尚锋, 黄锐, 付航, 等. 新医改下我国公共卫生财政投入问题研究[J]. 中国卫生经济, 2014, 33(9): 55 – 58.
[14]	刘克玲, 张德英, 孟庆跃, 等. 妇幼保健公共卫生服务项目成本测算研究[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2001, 16(1): 3 – 7, 64. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4411.2001.01.002
[15]	朱丽萍, 王怀军, 周冰华, 等. 上海市产前诊断服务现状[J]. 中国优生与遗传杂志, 2000, 8(3): 148, 141.
[16]	郑灵巧, 马彦明. 北京扩展婚前医学检查项目[N]. 健康报, 2013 – 06 – 07(001).
[17]	吴美玉, 罗洁鸣, 许薇, 等. 黄浦区退休和生活困难妇女“两病筛查”项目实施分析[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2013, 28(6): 908 – 910. doi: 10.7620/zgfybj.j.issn.1001-4411.2013.06.04
[18]	郝模. 卫生政策学(第2版)(全国高等学校教材)(附光盘)[M]. 人民卫生出版社, 2013: 30 – 33.
[19]	Ellencweig AY. Analyzing health systems: a modular approach[M]. London: Oxford University Press, 1992.
[20]	郝模. 健康中国的基石: 适宜公共卫生体系[A]. “健康中国与公众健康”复旦论坛暨公共卫生体系适宜程度首次发布会主旨报告[C]. 上海: 复旦大学卫生发展战略研究中心, 2019.
[21]	姜龙训, 刘思薇, 刘志强, 等. 保健科免疫与妇幼管理系统儿童数量对比抽样分析[J]. 中国数字医学, 2016, 11(5): 104 – 106, 119. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-7571.2016.05.034
[22]	孙志城, 王莉婷, 李奇奇, 等. 中国2011 — 2014年县级妇幼保健机构孕产期保健和妇女保健服务提供及发展能力分析[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2016, 32(9): 1198 – 1202. doi: 10.11847/zgggws2016-32-09-18