高级检索

不同性取向大学生男男性行为者艾滋病感染相关行为差异性分析

Differences in HIV-related behaviors among MSM college/university students with different sexual orientations: a cross-sectional survey in Zhejiang province

  • 摘要:
    目的 了解不同性取向的大学生男男性行为者(MSM)艾滋病相关行为的差异。
    方法 2022年3 — 7月在浙江省4个项目市(杭州市、宁波市、嘉兴市和金华市)由社会组织采用方便抽样法招募年龄 ≥ 18岁的在校大学生MSM作为研究对象。采用面对面询问的方式进行问卷调查。调查内容包括户籍、学校所在地、年级、性取向、网络临时性行为、物质滥用、艾滋病知识、暴露前后预防和艾滋病检测等。采用SPSS 25.0软件进行比较分析。
    结果  共招募682名在校大学生MSM,回收671份有效问卷。同性性取向、双性性取向/性取向不确定者分别占73.3%(492/671)、26.7% (179/671)。与同性性取向者相比,双性/性取向不确定者出柜比例低,50.8%(91/179)vs.60.2%(296/492);首次男男性行为发生时间间隔在1年以内的比例高,48.8% (81/166)vs.37.4%(176/470),首次男男性行为为被诱导或被胁迫比例高27.4% (49/179)vs.16.5%( 81/492),最近1次网约临时性行为使用助性剂rush popper比例高40.7% (33/81) vs.27.1%(64/236);获得安全套同伴教育比例低70.9% (127/179)vs.79.1%(389/492);既往自我检测次数 ≥ 1次比例低,64.4% (112/174) vs.76.0%(364/479),差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。
    结论 同性性取向与双性性取向/性取向不确定大学生MSM在出柜、首次男男性行为时间间隔及发生类型、rush popper等物质滥用、安全套同伴教育和HIV自我检测等方面均存在差异,应加强针对性干预降低该人群HIV感染风险。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To examine differences in HIV-related behaviors among college students who are men who have sex with men (MSM) and of different sexual orientations.
    Methods A total of 682 MSM students aged ≥18 years were recruited from colleges/universities in four cities (Hangzhou, Ningbo, Jiaxing and Jinhua) in Zhejiang province through convenience sampling with the help of NGO (non-governmental organization) for a web-based on-site survey with face-to-face instructions from interviewers from March to July 2022. Participants' information on household registration, campus location, years in college, public expression of sexual identity, online casual sex, substance abuse, HIV knowledge, pre-exposure and post-exposure prophylaxis, and HIV testing were collected using a self-compiled questionnaire. SPSS 25.0 software was used for data analysis.
    Results Of the 671 valid respondents, 73.3% reported a homosexual orientation and 26.7% reported a bisexual/unsure orientation. Compared to respondents with a homosexual orientation, respondents with a bisexual/uncertain orientation reported significantly lower rates of publicly expressing their sexual identity (50.8% vs. 60.2%), receiving health education about condom use from peers (70.9% vs. 79.1%), and self-testing for HIV once or more (64. 4% vs. 76.0%), but significantly higher rates of first homosexual behavior within the past year (48.8% vs. 37.4%), being seduced or coerced into first homosexual behavior (27.4% vs. 16.5%), and using sex-stimulating rush popper during their last online casual sexual encounter (40.7% vs. 27.1%) (P < 0.05 for all).
    Conclusion There are significant differences between MSM college/university students with a homosexual orientation and those with a bisexual/unsure orientation in public expression of sexual identity, timing and type of first homosexual encounter, use of rush popper and other substances, receipt of peer education about condom use, and self-testing for HIV, suggesting that targeted interventions to reduce the risk of HIV infection in this population should be strengthened.

     

/

返回文章
返回