高级检索

卫生资源配置、健康保障与老龄群体养老服务选择分析

Associations of health resource allocation and health security with preferences for elderly care services among older adults in China: an analysis of CLHLS data

  • 摘要:
    目的 了解卫生资源配置、健康保障对我国老龄群体养老服务选择的影响,为促进健康老龄化发展提供参考依据。
    方法 收集中国老年健康影响因素跟踪调查(CLHLS)2011、2014和2018年面板数据中2 444名≥65岁老龄人群样本,使用混合效应logit回归(MLR)模型分析卫生资源配置、健康保障对老龄群体养老服务选择的影响,并从年龄、居住地类型进行异质性分析,使用广义估计模型(GEE)设定不同的链接函数(logit和probit)进行稳健性检验。
    结果 卫生资源可得性(β=1.587,P<0.05)和卫生资源可达性(β=0.790,P<0.05)越高、健康保障水平越高(β=0.38,P<0.05),老龄群体选择机构养老的概率更高;反之,老龄群体选择居家养老的概率更高。异质性结果表明,卫生资源可得性和卫生资源可达性均对高龄老人(≥80岁)影响显著(β=1.729,P<0.05; β=0.832,P<0.05);健康保障对低龄和高龄老人养老服务选择影响均显著(β=0.392,P<0.05; β=0.363,P<0.05);卫生资源可得性、卫生资源可达性和健康保障对乡镇老龄群体养老服务选择影响均显著(β=1.433,P<0.05; β=0.619,P<0.05;β=0.326,P<0.05);卫生资源可得性、卫生资源可达性和健康保障对农村老龄群体养老服务选择影响均显著(β=1.850,P<0.05; β=1.084,P<0.05;β=0.340,P<0.05)。
    结论 卫生资源配置和健康保障对于老龄群体养老服务选择存在显著影响,同时卫生资源配置对不同年龄段和居住地类型老年群体影响存在差异,健康保障对不同居住地类型老龄群体影响存在差异。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To explore the impact of health resource allocation and health security on the choice of elderly care services among China's elderly population, and to provide insights for promoting healthy aging.
    Methods The panel data of 2 444 elderly people aged over 65 years old were selected from the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey (CLHLS) in 2011, 2014, and 2018. A mixed-effects logit regression model (MLR) with random effects was used to analyze the impact of health resource allocation and health security on the choice of elderly care services. Age heterogeneity was examined through subgroup analysis based on age and residence type. The robustness of the results was tested by comparing different link functions (logit and probit) using generalized estimating equations (GEE), which were chosen to account for potential model misspecification and to ensure the reliability of the results.
    Results Health resource availability (β = 1.587, P < 0.05), health resource accessibility (β = 0.790, P < 0.05), and health security (β = 0.380, P < 0.05) were significantly associated with increased odds of the elderly choosing institutional care. Specifically, after exponentiating the beta coefficients, for each 1-grade increase in health resource availability, health resource accessibility, and health security, the odds of the elderly choosing institutional care increased by a factor of 4.89, 2.20, and 1.46, respectively (all P < 0.05). Heterogeneity analysis results indicate that both the availability (β = 1.729, P < 0.05) and accessibility (β = 0.832, P < 0.05) of health resources have a significant impact on the choice of elderly care services for the oldest elderly (≥ 80 years); the impact of health security on the choice of elderly care services for both the young elderly (β = 0.392) and the oldest elderly (β = 0.363) is significant (both P < 0.05); the availability of health resources (β = 1.433), accessibility of health resources (β = 0.619), and health security (β = 0.326) have a significant impact on the choice of elderly care services for the urban elderly population (all P < 0.05); availability of health resources (β = 1.850), accessibility of health resources (β = 1.084), and health security (β = 0.340) have a significant impact on the choice of elderly care services for the rural elderly population (all P < 0.05).
    Conclusions The allocation of health resources and health security significantly influence the choice of elderly care services. The allocation of health resources affects different age groups and residential types of the elderly population differently, while the impact of health security varies across residential types.

     

/

返回文章
返回