高级检索

中国社区老年心理健康服务人员岗位胜任力及其影响因素分析

Job competency and its influencing factors among community mental health service providers for the elderly in China

  • 摘要:
    目的 了解中国社区老年心理健康服务人员岗位胜任力及其影响因素,为积极应对老年心理健康问题及需求、提升基层老年心理健康服务能力提供参考依据。
    方法 于2019年11月采用方便抽样方法在中国31个省(自治区、直辖市)抽取的818个社区中招募5 806名从事心理健康服务的各级管理人员和业务人员进行问卷调查,采用潜在类别分析(LCA)探索社区老年心理健康服务态度特征的潜变量,并应用多元线性回归模型分析社区老年心理健康服务人员岗位胜任力的影响因素。
    结果 最终纳入分析的5 793名中国社区老年心理健康服务人员综合岗位胜任力得分为0~5分,平均得分为(2.55±1.08)分。LCA结果显示,社区老年心理健康服务态度的潜在类别为高认同高态度专业组1 531人(26.43%),低认同低态度组4 262人(73.57%)。多元线性回归分析结果显示,与男性相比,女性社区老年心理健康服务人员综合岗位胜任力平均得分增加0.109分(β=0.109,t=3.35,P<0.001);与18~29岁相比,30~44岁、45~59岁和≥60岁社区老年心理健康服务人员综合岗位胜任力平均得分分别降低0.156分(β= –0.156,t= –3.40,P<0.001)、0.228分(β= –0.228,t= –4.99,P<0.001)和0.285分(β= –0.285,t= –4.57,P<0.001);与中学及以下文化程度相比,大专、本科和硕士及以上文化程度社区老年心理健康服务人员综合岗位胜任力平均得分分别增加0.185分(β=0.185,t=4.33,P<0.001)、0.385分(β=0.385,t=8.83,P<0.001)和0.518分(β=0.518,t=6.16,P<0.001);与未定级职称相比,中级职称和高级职称社区老年心理健康服务人员综合岗位胜任力平均得分分别增加0.148分(β=0.148,t=3.75,P<0.001)和0.177分(β=0.177,t=2.97,P=0.003)。
    结论 中国社区老年心理健康服务人员岗位胜任力较低,年龄、性别、文化程度和职称是社区老年心理健康服务人员岗位胜任力的主要影响因素。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To understand the job competency of community geriatric mental health service personnel in China and its influencing factors, and to provide a reference for actively addressing the mental health problems and needs of the elderly and improving the capacity of primary-level geriatric mental health services.
    Methods In November 2019, a convenience sampling method was used to recruit 5 806 managers and professionals at all levels engaged in mental health services from 818 communities sampled in 31 provinces (autonomous regions, and municipalities) in China for a questionnaire survey. Latent class analysis (LCA) was used to explore the latent variables of attitudes towards community geriatric mental health services, and a multiple linear regression model was used to analyze the influencing factors of job competency among community geriatric mental health service personnel.
    Results The comprehensive job competency scores of the 5 793 Chinese community geriatric mental health service personnel finally included in the analysis ranged from 0 to 5, with an average score of (2.55±1.08). The LCA results showed that the latent classes of attitudes towards community geriatric mental health services were high identification and high attitude professional group (n=1 531, 26.43%) and low identification and low attitude group (n=4 262, 73.57%). Multiple linear regression analysis showed that compared with men, the average comprehensive job competency score of female community geriatric mental health service personnel increased by 0.109 points (β=0.109, t=3.35, P<0.001); compared with the 18-29 age group, the average comprehensive job competency scores of community geriatric mental health service personnel aged 30–44, 45–59, and ≥60 years decreased by 0.156 points (β= –0.156, t= –3.40, P<0.001), 0.228 points (β= –0.228, t= –4.99, P<0.001), and 0.285 points (β= –0.285, t= –4.57, P<0.001), respectively; compared with those with a high school education or below, the average comprehensive job competency scores of community geriatric mental health service personnel with college, undergraduate, and master's degrees or above increased by 0.185 points (β=0.185, t=4.33, P<0.001), 0.385 points (β=0.385, t=8.83, P<0.001), and 0.518 points (β=0.518, t=6.16, P<0.001), respectively; compared with those with no professional title, the average comprehensive job competency scores of community geriatric mental health service personnel with intermediate and senior professional titles increased by 0.148 points (β=0.148, t=3.75, P<0.001) and 0.177 points (β=0.177, t=2.97, P=0.003), respectively.
    Conclusions The job competency of community geriatric mental health service personnel in China is relatively low, and age, gender, education level, and professional title are the main influencing factors.

     

/

返回文章
返回