高级检索

学校控烟干预对青少年电子烟认知、态度及行为影响

The impact of school smoking control interventions on adolescents′ knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors regarding e-cigarettes

  • 摘要:
    目的 通过比较控烟干预实施前后学生对电子烟的认知、态度及使用情况变化,分析学校控烟干预效果,为进一步开展校内控烟措施提供依据。
    方法 于2022年10月—2023年5月,在上海市青浦区某中职学校对全体在校学生开展为期半年的控烟干预。干预前、后各进行1次匿名问卷调查,以性别、年级、家庭成员及朋友是否使用卷烟、电子烟作为匹配变量进行倾向性评分匹配,匹配后数据采用χ2检验进行比较分析。
    结果 基线和干预后分别回收到981和819份有效问卷。通过倾向性评分匹配,共获得770名学生的基线和随访数据。在干预结束后,有79.5%的学生在活动效果评价时表示希望学校继续推动无烟环境建设。经学校控烟干预后,学生对电子烟危害的认知程度有所提升,其中学生认同“电子烟存在安全隐患”的比例由81.8%显著上升至85.8%(χ2=4.604,P=0.032);青少年对于支持电子烟管控的相关陈述均有所上升,尤其是室内公共场所禁止吸电子烟的支持率在干预后上升4.4%;学生尝试使用电子烟的比例从4.4%增至5.5%,当前吸电子烟及有使用意愿的学生比例均有所下降。
    结论 学校控烟干预在提升学生对电子烟相关知识的知晓率、认知态度以及降低使用意愿方面效果显著,但仍需进一步加大干预力度。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To analyze the effectiveness of school-based tobacco control interventions by comparing students′ knowledge, attitudes, and use of e-cigarettes before and after the implementation of interventions, and to provide a basis for further development of school-based tobacco control measures.
    Methods From October 2022 to May 2023, a six-month tobacco control intervention was conducted among all students in a vocational high school in Qingpu district, Shanghai. Anonymous questionnaires were administered before and after the intervention. Propensity score matching was performed using gender, grade, and smoking/vaping status of family members and friends as matching variables. Data were compared using the χ2 test.
    Results A total of 981 and 819 valid questionnaires were collected at baseline and post-intervention, respectively. After propensity score matching, baseline and follow-up data from 770 students were obtained. At the end of the intervention, 79.5% of the students expressed their hope that the school would continue to promote the construction of a smoke-free environment. After the school-based tobacco control intervention, students′ awareness of the harms of e-cigarettes improved. The proportion of students who agreed that "e-cigarettes pose safety hazards" increased significantly from 81.8% to 85.8% (χ2=4.604, P=0.032). Support for e-cigarette control measures increased among adolescents, especially support for banning e-cigarettes in indoor public places, which increased by 4.4% after the intervention. The proportion of students who had ever tried e-cigarettes increased from 4.4% to 5.5%, while the proportions of current e-cigarette users and those intending to use e-cigarettes decreased.
    Conclusions School-based tobacco control interventions are effective in improving students′ knowledge, attitudes, and intentions regarding e-cigarettes, but further efforts are needed to enhance the effectiveness of these interventions.

     

/

返回文章
返回