高级检索

医防融合背景下二级以上医疗机构公共卫生履职评价指标体系构建:以南京市为例

Establishment of an evaluation index system for public health responsibilities of secondary and tertiary medical institutions under the integration of medical services and prevention: a case study in Nanjing

  • 摘要:
    目的 构建二级以上医疗机构公共卫生履职评价指标体系,强化医疗机构公共卫生职能,提升地区医疗机构与公共卫生机构协同效能。
    方法  2023年,根据我国及江苏省关于强化医疗机构公共卫生职责落实相关政策与决策部署,通过调研座谈、专家研讨、政策文献检索研究初步形成指标体系框架,采用德尔菲法对20名相关领域专家进行2轮咨询,构建二级以上医疗机构公共卫生履职评价指标体系,应用层次分析法确定指标权重。
    结果  专家二轮问卷回收率均为100%,专家权威程度为0.88,专家意见协调程度符合要求(P<0.001)。 构建的指标体系由8个一级指标、23个二级指标、72个三级指标组成。各级指标的重要性评分、适宜性评分和总评分均数均不低于4.00分,变异系数<20%。层次分析发现,公共卫生安全管理(0.194)、传染病防治管理(0.147)、免疫服务管理(0.136)是医疗机构公共卫生履职的重点内容。
    结论  二级以上医院公共卫生履职评价指标体系有助于医疗机构明确公共卫生职责要点,强化公共卫生履职,优化医防融合路径,健全地区公共卫生服务和疾病预防控制体制机制。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To establish an evaluation index system for public health responsibilities in secondary and tertiary medical institutions, thus strengthening the public health functions of medical institutions and enhancing the collaboration between regional medical and public health institutions.
    Methods In 2023, in line with China's national and Jiangsu provincial policies and decisions on strengthening the implementation of public health responsibilities in medical institutions, a framework for the evaluation index system was initially developed through interviews, expert discussion, and policy-literature analysis. The Delphi method was then applied with 20 experts across relevant fields over two consultation rounds to establish the evaluation index system for the public health responsibilities in secondary and tertiary medical institutions. The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was employed to determine the weight of each index.
    Results The recovery rates of questionnaires reached 100% in both rounds, with an expert authority coefficient of 0.88 and the coefficient of concordance meeting the criteria (P<0.001). The evaluation index system consisted of 8 first-level indexes, 23 second-level indexes, and 72 third-level indexes. The mean importance scores, appropriateness scores, and total scores for all levels of indexes were not less than 4.00, with a coefficient of variation below 20%. The AHP results revealed that public health safety management (0.194), infectious disease prevention and control (0.147), and immunization services (0.136) are key areas of public health responsibilities for medical institutions.
    Conclusions The evaluation index system for public health responsibilities of secondary and tertiary hospitals helps medical institutions clarify key points of public health responsibilities, strengthen the public health responsibilities, optimize the integration paths of medical services and prevention, and enhance the systems and mechanisms for public health services and disease prevention and control.

     

/

返回文章
返回