高级检索

小学生课堂久坐行为、久坐积累模式与体质健康关系:一项2023年横断面研究

Associations of volume and accumulation patterns of sedentary behavior with physical fitness among elementary school students: a cross-sectional study, 2023

  • 摘要:
    目的 探讨小学生课堂久坐总时长、久坐积累模式(单次久坐时长与久坐间断时长)的特征及与体质健康之间的关系。
    方法 于2023年9—10月采用方便抽样方法,选取湖北省武汉市、浙江省金华市605名1~5年级小学生,使用加速度传感器测量久坐总时长,并统计不同类型的单次久坐时长与单次久坐间断时长,依据《国家学生体质健康标准(2014年修订)》对受试者进行体质健康测评,采用二分类逻辑回归探讨久坐总时长、久坐积累模式与体质健康间的关系。
    结果 受试小学生久坐总时间占课堂总时间的65.2%,单次久坐1~19 min占比(47.3%)与单次久坐间断1~4 min占比(17.7%)最高。单次久坐5~9 min、≥20 min时长占比最高的Q4组发生体质健康未达标优良的概率为Q1组的0.451倍(OR=0.451,95%CI=0.247~0.823)和2.16倍(OR=2.16,95%CI=1.043~4.474);久坐总时长占比、单次久坐间断时长占比与体质健康未达标优良之间均无显著关联。进一步分析体质健康评价指标发现,久坐总时长占比最高的Q4组发生身体成分未达标优良的概率为Q1组的3.673倍(OR=3.673,95%CI=1.085~12.434);而单次持续5~9 min久坐时长占比最高的Q4组发生速度素质、力量素质未达标优良的概率为Q1组的0.48倍(OR=0.48,95%CI=0.262~0.881)和0.378倍(OR=0.378,95%CI=0.162~0.882);单次持续≥20 min久坐时长占比最高的Q4组发生身体成分、力量素质未达标优良的概率为Q1组的4.969倍(OR=4.969,95%CI=1.406~17.560)和2.717倍(OR=2.717,95%CI=1.120~6.593)。
    结论 小学生课堂久坐呈短时性、间歇性的“碎片化”特征。相对于课堂久坐总时长,在课堂中缩短单次久坐时长对于小学生健康更为重要。针对小学生的身体成分,需减少课堂中的久坐总时长与单次久坐时长;针对力量素质、速度素质指标的提升,则主要通过缩短课堂单次久坐时长来达成。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To explore the associations of volume and accumulation patterns (duration of sedentary bouts and breaks) of sedentary behavior with physical fitness among elementary school students.
    Methods From September to October 2023, a convenience sampling method was adopted to select 605 elementary school students (grades 1 to 5) from Wuhan city, Hubei province and Jinhua city, Zhejiang province. Accelerometers were used to measure the sedentary volume and the duration of sedentary bouts and breaks. The physical fitness were scored according to the National Student Physical Health Standards (Revised in 2014). Binary logistic regression was employed to examine the associations of volume and accumulation patterns of sedentary behavior with physical fitness.
    Results The surveyed students spent 65.2% of the classroom time in sedentary behavior. The highest proportions were observed for the sedentary bouts of 1–19 min (47.3%) and breaks of 1–4 min (17.7%) in class. In the Q4 group with the highest proportions of sedentary bouts lasting 5–9 min and ≥ 20 min , the odds of failing to achieve good or excellent physical fitness were 0.451 times (OR = 0.451, 95%CI: 0.247–0.823) and 2.16 times (OR = 2.16, 95%CI: 1.043–4.474), respectively, those of the Q1 group. No statistically significant associations were observed between the proportion of sedentary volume or sedentary break duration and failure to achieve good or excellent physical fitness. Further analysis of physical fitness factors revealed that the odds of failure to achieve good or excellent physical fitness in the Q4 group with the highest sedentary volume proportion were 3.673 times that of the Q1 group (OR = 3.673, 95%CI: 1.085–12.434). For the sedentary bouts of 5–9 min, the Q4 group exhibited lower odds of poor speed ability (OR=0.48, 95%CI: 0.262–0.881) and strength ability (OR = 0.378, 95%CI: 0.162–0.882) than the Q1 group. In contrast, the Q4 group with the highest proportion of sedentary bouts ≥ 20 min showed 4.969 times higher odds of poor body composition (OR = 4.969, 95%CI: 1.406–17.560) and 2.717 times higher odds of poor strength ability (OR = 2.717, 95%CI: 1.120–6.593) than the Q1 group.
    Conclusions The sedentary behavior of elementary school students presents a fragmented pattern characterized by short terms and frequent breaks. Reducing the duration of sedentary bouts in class may be more important for the fitness of elementary school students than reducing the volume of sedentary behavior. According to the body composition, it is necessary to reduce the volume of sedentary behavior and shorten the duration of sedentary bouts in class. The quality of strength and speed can be improved by shortening the duration of sedentary bouts in class.

     

/

返回文章
返回