高级检索

急性呼吸道传染病预警综合指标体系构建:基于德尔菲专家咨询法

Development of indicator systems for early warning of acute respiratory infection: a Delphi stduy

  • 摘要:
    目的 构建多源数据急性呼吸道传染病预警综合指标体系。
    方法 使用德尔菲法进行专家咨询,邀请20名专家对不同预警指标的必要性、可获得性、敏感性进行评分,并依据评分结果确定权重。
    结果 2轮专家咨询专家积极系数均为100%、专家权威系数为0.79,专家意见协调程度分别为0.280与0.487(P<0.05)。依据急性呼吸道传染病的发生、传播与流行各阶段特点,建立了急性呼吸道传染病风险预警指标体系和急性呼吸道传染病征兆预警指标体系,其中前者包含五类22项预警指标,后者包含六大类29项预警指标。急性呼吸道传染病风险预警指标体系中,权重最高的前3项指标依次为“人群疫苗接种率”(0.052)、“已知病原体的变异”(0.051)和“优势流行株改变”(0.051);急性呼吸道传染病征兆预警指标体系中,权重最高的3项指标依次为“呼吸道症候群监测数据”(0.040)、“病原阳性率”(0.040)和“网络直报病例数”(0.040)。
    结论 本研究依据德尔菲法建立的多源数据急性呼吸道传染病预警综合指标体系具有一定的科学性与实用性,为完善多点触发的传染病预警提供支撑。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective  To establish comprehensive indicator systems for early warning of acute respiratory infection (ARI) based on multi-source data.
    Methods The Delphi method was adopted for expert consultation. Twenty experts were invited to score the necessity, availability, and sensitivity of different early warning indicators, and the weights were determined based on the scoring results.
    Results The two rounds of expert consultation showed the expert positive coefficients being both 100%, the coefficients of expert authority being both 0.79, and the coefficients of concordance being 0.280 and 0.487 (P < 0.05), respectively. According to the characteristics of ARI in the stages of occurrence, transmission, and epidemics, two indicator systems–the early warning indicator system for risk of ARI and the early warning indicator system for potential clustering or outbreak of ARI–were established. The former included 22 indicators in 5 categories, and the latter included 29 indicators in 6 categories. In the early warning indicator system for risk of ARI, the top 3 indicators with the highest weights were immunization coverage rate (0.052), variations of known pathogens (0.051), and variations of dominant prevalent strains (0.051). In the early warning indicator system for potential clustering or outbreak of ARI, the top 3 indicators with the highest weights were surveillance data of respiratory syndrome (0.040), positive rate of specific pathogen (0.040), and number of cases reported in online direct report system (0.040).
    Conclusions The comprehensive indicator systems for early warning of ARI based on multi-source data and Delphi method established in this study have certain scientificity and practicability, which can provide support for improving the multi-point triggered early warning of infectious diseases.

     

/

返回文章
返回