高级检索

新医科背景下地方综合性院校预防医学专业人才培养方案分析

Preventive medicine talent cultivation programs at local comprehensive universities under the New Medical Science initiative

  • 摘要:
    目的 构建新医科背景下预防医学专业人才培养方案核心要素体系,评估地方综合性院校培养方案现状,为人才培养改革提供参考依据。
    方法 系统梳理2024年6月—2025年8月预防医学教育政策及学术文献13份,采用内容分析法、Nvivo 10软件编码构建核心要素体系;收集20所地方综合性院校2024年预防医学培养方案,使用Excel整理数据并对标核心要素体系进行分析。
    结果 地方综合性院校在课程体系中,学科交叉融合、新兴技术应用、全球健康视野课程覆盖率分别为45%、35%和30%,前沿领域覆盖不足;实践教学开放度与创新创业实践覆盖率分别为40%和50%,创新性有待提升;双师型、跨学科背景教师占比分别为35%和30%,复合型师资相对缺乏。
    结论 地方综合性院校预防医学教育在课程前沿性、实践创新性及师资结构方面与新医科要求存在一定差距,需加强课程优化、教学模式创新及复合型师资建设。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective  To establish a core element framework for preventive medicine talent cultivation programs under the New Medical Science initiative and evaluate the current status of training programs in local comprehensive universities, thereby providing references for talent training reforms.
    Methods  Thirteen policy documents and academic publications on preventive medicine education from June 2024 to August 2025 were systematically reviewed. Content analysis and NVivo 10 software were employed to codify core elements. Training programs from 20 local comprehensive universities (2024) were collected, with core element alignment analyzed via Excel.
    Results  Among local comprehensive universities, the curriculum coverage rates for interdisciplinary integration, emerging technology applications, and global health perspectives were 45%, 35%, and 30%, respectively, indicating insufficient coverage in advanced fields. Practical teaching openness and innovation/entrepreneurship practice coverage stood at 40% and 50%, respectively, highlighting a need for enhanced innovation. Dual-qualified teachers and interdisciplinary faculty accounted for 35% and 30%, respectively, revealing a relative lack of composite faculty.
    Conclusions  There is a gap between the preventive medicine education in local comprehensive universities and the requirements of New Medical Science in terms of curriculum advancement, practical innovation, and faculty structure. Reforms should prioritize curriculum optimization, teaching model innovation, and composite faculty development.

     

/

返回文章
返回