高级检索

村(居)民委员会公共卫生委员会建设水平评价指标体系构建与维度解析:基于德尔菲专家咨询法

Construction and dimension analysis of an evaluation index system for the capacity of community (village) public health committees: based on the Delphi expert consultation method

  • 摘要:
    目的 构建村(居)民委员会公共卫生委员会建设水平评价指标,为完善城市公共卫生委员会建设、提升基层公共卫生治理效能提供参考。
    方法 于2024年3—10月,采用文献查阅、政策分析、专题小组访谈等方法初步构建村(居)民委员会公共卫生委员会建设水平评价指标体系,经2轮德尔菲专家咨询后确定最终指标,并用层次分析法计算各指标权重。
    结果 共有25名专家参与咨询,最终确定的指标体系包含5个一级指标,20个二级指标,29个三级指标。2轮咨询专家积极系数均为100%,权威系数≥0.70;各指标重要性和可操作性均值较高(7.40~9.96);变异系数CV≤0.25;2轮咨询的协调系数W(第1轮重要性和可操作性分别为0.129和0.156;第2轮重要性和可操作性分别为0.512和0.582)差异有统计学意义(均P<0.001),专家意见集中,有较好的一致性。
    结论 基于德尔菲法构建的村(居)民委员会公共卫生委员会建设水平评价指标体系具有一定的科学性和应用性,尚需进一步验证和评价。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To develop an evaluation index system for assessing the development levels of community (village) public health committees, thus providing insights for optimizing urban public health committee structures and enhancing primary-level public health governance efficacy.
    Methods From March 2024 to October 2024, an evaluation index system draft was constructed through literature review, policy analysis, and focus group interviews. Two rounds of Delphi expert consultations were conducted to finalize the index system, with index weights determined via the analytic hierarchy process (AHP).
    Results A total of twenty-five experts participated in the consultations. The finalized system comprised 5 first-level indexes, 20 second-level indexes, and 29 third-level indexes. Both consultation rounds achieved 100% expert response rates, with authority coefficients ≥ 0.70. High mean scores (from 7.40 to 9.96) were observed for index importance and feasibility, and the coefficients of variation (CV) were ≤ 0.25. The Kendall′s W coefficients improved between rounds (importance: 0.129 to 0.512; feasibility: 0.156 to 0.582) (P < 0.001).
    Conclusion The Delphi method-based evaluation index system demonstrates scientific validity and practical applicability for assessing the development levels of community (village) public health committees. Further empirical validation is recommended to refine its utility.

     

/

返回文章
返回