高级检索

HIV感染者面向医务人员信息披露测量量表编制:基于德尔菲专家咨询法

Development of a disclosure-to-healthcare-worker status scale for people living with HIV: a Delphi study

  • 摘要:
    目的 基于德尔菲专家咨询法初步编制人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)感染者面向医务人员披露状态测量量表,评估感染者向医务人员披露信息的真实性、广度、深度的心理倾向性,为预测HIV相关信息披露行为提供参考依据。
    方法 通过文献研究拟定量表初始条目,并于2025年6—9月遴选32名专家开展2轮德尔菲法咨询。请专家对量表各级指标的熟悉程度及判断依据进行评分,对条目重要性及相关性进行评分。计算问卷回收率,以此反映专家积极性;采用权威系数衡量咨询结果的权威程度;采用变异系数及协调系数Kendall′s W评价专家意见协调程度。重要性和相关性评分的算术均数≥3.5分且变异系数<0.25作为条目筛选的初步参考;同时结合专家意见,经研究小组成员充分讨论后确定条目调整结果。
    结果 2轮咨询专家积极系数均为96.88%(31/32),专家权威系数分别为0.847和0.852。第1轮条目重要性和相关性的专家意见协调系数为0.152和0.117,第2轮为0.090和0.082。第1轮专家咨询结果显示,各条目重要性评分为2.68~4.81分,变异系数为0.084~0.581;相关性评分为2.74~4.68分,变异系数为0.116~0.557。第2轮专家咨询结果显示,各条目的重要性评分为4.16~4.90分,变异系数为0.061~0.264;相关性评分为4.23~4.87分,变异系数为0.077~0.257。2轮专家咨询及专家小组会议后最终确定了包括个体心理特征、情境、风险、受益、披露效能5个维度、47个条目的HIV感染者面向医务人员披露状态测量量表。
    结论 本研究所构建的HIV感染者面向医务人员披露状态测量量表,用于评估HIV感染者在向医务人员透露病情相关信息时的真实态度、顾虑与倾向,量表信效度有待进一步验证,为优化医患沟通、提升HIV防治服务质量提供科学依据。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To preliminarily develop the disclosure-to-healthcare-worker status scale for people living with HIV through the Delphi method and assess the authenticity, breadth, and depth of participants′ psychological inclination when disclosing information to healthcare workers, thereby informing the prediction of HIV-related disclosure behaviors.
    Methods Following a systematic literature review, an initial item pool was generated. Between June and September 2025, 32 multidisciplinary experts were invited to participate in two Delphi rounds. Experts rated their familiarity with and rationale for each domain, as well as the importance and relevance of every item on a 5-point Likert scale. The response rate was calculated to reflect expert engagement. The authority coefficient (Cr) was adopted to indicate result credibility. The coefficient of variation (CV) and Kendall′s W were used to evaluate consensus. Items with mean importance or relevance ≥ 3.5 and CV < 0.25 were retained and then finalized after team discussion and expert feedback.
    Results The response rate of the experts in both rounds was 96.88% (31/32), with Cr values of 0.847 and 0.852, respectively. The Kendall′s W values of expert opinions on the importance and relevance of items were 0.152 and 0.117 in the first round and 0.090 and 0.082 in the second round, respectively. The results of the first round of expert consultation showed that the items had the importance scores of 2.68–4.81 points (CV of 0.084–0.581) and the relevance scores of 2.74–4.68 points (CV of 0.116–0.557). The results of the second round of expert consultation showed that the items had the importance scores of 4.16–4.90 points (CV of 0.061–0.264) and the relevance scores of 4.23–4.87 points (CV of 0.077–0.257). After two rounds of expert consultation and expert group meetings, a 47-item scale was finally determined, including individual psychological characteristics, situations, perceived risks, perceived benefits, and disclosure effectiveness.
    Conclusions This study developed a 47-item disclosure-to-healthcare-worker status scale for people living with HIV to access their actual attitudes, concerns, and tendencies when disclosing relevant information to healthcare workers. Although the reliability and validity of this scale remains to be tested, the developed scale provides a basis for improving doctor-patient communication and enhancing the quality of HIV prevention and control services.

     

/

返回文章
返回