高级检索

北京市认知障碍高危老年人群综合干预效果分析:一项筛查与短期干预研究

Comprehensive intervention effect in a high-risk elderly population with cognitive impairment in Beijing: a screening and short-term intervention study

  • 摘要:
    目的 评价北京市认知障碍高危老年人群的综合干预效果,为探索对老年人群认知障碍有效的干预模式提供科学依据。
    方法 于2024年4月采用分层多阶段整群抽样方法在北京市东城区、朝阳区、丰台区、海淀区、通州区、顺义区、大兴区和怀柔区8个区抽取222名社区65~80岁老年人进行早期痴呆筛查量表(8条目)(AD8)和简单智能评估量表(MMSE)测试,于2024年4—10月对AD8量表得分≥2分的认知障碍高危老年人进行为期6个月的综合干预(包括慢性病管理、八段锦锻炼和益智游戏)。通过比较干预前后的AD8量表得分和MMSE得分评价综合干预对北京市认知障碍高危老年人群的干预效果。
    结果 北京市最终纳入分析的203名认知障碍高危老年人干预前和干预后的AD8量表平均分分别为(3.44±1.44)分和(2.65±2.28)分;MMSE量表平均分分别为(25.90±3.94)分和(27.96±2.66)分;干预前、后AD8量表和MMSE量表平均分差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.001)。干预后有129名(63.55%)认知障碍高危老年人AD8得分得到改善,有131名(64.53%)认知障碍高危老年人MMSE得分得到提升。
    结论 综合干预对北京市认知障碍高危老年人群认知能力具有积极的改善效果,应在今后的工作中积极推广该项干预措施。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To evaluate the comprehensive intervention effect in a high-risk elderly population with cognitive impairment in Beijing, thus providing a scientific basis for exploring effective intervention models.
    Methods In April 2024, a stratified multistage cluster sampling method was used to select 222 elderly individuals aged 65–80 years from communities in eight districts—Dongcheng district, Chaoyang district, Fengtai district, Haidian district, Tongzhou district, Shunyi district, Daxing district, and Huairou district—of Beijing for testing with the Eight-item Informant Interview to Differentiate Aging and Dementia (AD8) and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). From April to October 2024, a six-month comprehensive intervention (including chronic disease management, Baduanjin exercise, and educational games) was conducted for high-risk elderly individuals with AD8 scores ≥ 2. The intervention effect was evaluated by comparing the AD8 and MMSE scores before and after the intervention.
    Results  Among the 203 high-risk elderly individuals with cognitive impairment finally included in the analysis in Beijing, the average AD8 scores were (3.44±1.44) and (2.65±2.28) points and the average MMSE scores were (25.90±3.94) and (27.96±2.66) points before and after the intervention, respectively. The differences in average AD8 and MMSE scores before and after the intervention were statistically significant (both P<0.001). After the intervention, 129 (63.55%) and 131 (64.53%) high-risk elderly individuals with cognitive impairment showed improvement in AD8 scores and MMSE scores, respectively.
    Conclusions The comprehensive intervention method has a positive effect on the cognitive ability of high-risk elderly people with cognitive impairment in Beijing, and this intervention measure should be actively promoted in the future work.

     

/

返回文章
返回