高级检索

三生空间视角下健康生存环境理论框架与测度工具构建

Construction of a theoretical framework and measurement tools for a healthy living environment from the perspective of production-living-ecological spaces

  • 摘要:
    目的  以“生产空间–生活空间–生态空间”(“三生”空间)为核心构建健康生存环境理论框架与测度工具,旨在为量化测度区域环境健康水平提供科学、可操作的评估工具,为破解健康不平等、推进“健康共富”战略提供理论支撑与实证依据,并为精准识别环境健康风险敞口与空间靶向的公共卫生干预政策提供参考。
    方法 通过文献研究、专家咨询与定性访谈建立健康生存环境理论框架与指标体系,使用主客观综合评价法计算健康生存环境综合指数,通过广义加性模型评估健康生存环境综合指数评价效果。
    结果 从总体上看,健康生存环境综合指数呈现东南高,西部与东北部低的格局,北京市、上海市、天津市和重庆市指数高于47.57,健康生存环境最优。评价效果分析结果表明,健康生存环境综合指数与平均预期寿命之间呈正相关关系,提高生存环境水平能够增加人群健康效益。
    结论  基于“三生”空间构建的健康生存环境理论模型与测度工具科学有效,为实现健康共富提供了理论与工具支持。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective  To construct a theoretical framework and measurement tools for a healthy living environment centered on the “production-living-ecological spaces” (PLES), thus providing a scientific and operable assessment tool for quantifying regional environmental health levels, theoretical support and empirical evidence for addressing health inequalities and advancing the strategy of common prosperity in health, and references for public health intervention policies that precisely identify environmental health risk exposure and implement spatial targeted interventions.
    Methods  A theoretical framework and indicator system for a healthy living environment were established through literature review, expert consultation, and qualitative interviews. A comprehensive index of healthy living environment was calculated through a combined subjective-objective evaluation method. The evaluation effectiveness of the comprehensive index was assessed via a generalized additive model (GAM).
    Results  Overall, the comprehensive index of healthy living environment exhibited a spatial pattern of being high in the southeast and low in the west and northeast. Beijing, Shanghai, Tianjin, and Chongqing had an index higher than 47.57, representing the optimal healthy living environment. The evaluation effectiveness analysis revealed a positive correlation between the comprehensive index of healthy living environment and average life expectancy, indicating that improving the living environment can enhance population health benefits.
    Conclusion The theoretical model and measurement tools for a healthy living environment that is constructed from the PLES perspective are scientifically valid and effective, providing theoretical and instrumental support for achieving common prosperity in health.

     

/

返回文章
返回