高级检索

基于CIPP评价模式构建公共卫生本科人才培养质量评价指标体系

Development of an indicator system for evaluation of quality of undergraduate education in public health: a Delphi study based on CIPP evaluation model

  • 摘要:
    目的 构建公共卫生本科人才培养质量评价指标体系,为公共卫生与预防医学类专业本科教学改革提供依据。
    方法 基于CIPP评价模式,采用文献研究初步构建评价指标体系,运用德尔菲专家咨询法和小组讨论法确定最终指标体系,使用层次分析法确定各指标权重。
    结果 2轮函询后,专家积极系数均为100%,群体权威系数分别为0.746和0.789。第2轮函询后,一、二级指标的肯德尔协调系数W均有提升,分别为0.297和0.237(P < 0.05)。最终评价指标体系含4个一级指标、12个二级指标和52个三级指标。一级指标权重系数分别为“A背景评价(0.233)”“B输入评价(0.141)”“C过程评价(0.233)”“D结果评价(0.394)”。
    结论 最终指标体系通过一致性检验,具备科学性、全面性和较好的应用价值,对公共卫生类专业本科人才培养质量评价具有指导意义。指标权重提示公共卫生人才培养需与社会需要相匹配,强化学生专业认同感才能更好地促进学科发展。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To establish an evaluation indicator system for the quality of undergraduate training of public health talents, and to provide a basis for the reform of undergraduate teaching in public health and preventive medicine.
    Methods Based on the context, input, process, product (CIPP) evaluation model, a preliminary evaluation indicator system was constructed through literature review. Two rounds of Delphi expert consultation were conducted with 15 experts in social medicine and health services, epidemiology, biostatistics, microbial testing, health toxicology and nutrition, and educational management. After the group discussion method was used to determine the indicators of the evaluation system, the analytical hierarchy process was taken to determine the weight of each indicator.
    Results After two rounds of consultation, the expert positive coefficient was 100% and the group authority coefficient was 0.746 and 0.789, respectively. After the second round of consultation, the Kendall coordination coefficient W of the primary and secondary indicators increased to 0.297 and 0.237, respectively (both P < 0.05). The final evaluation indicator system contains 4 primary, 12 secondary, and 52 tertiary indicators. The weight coefficients of the four primary indicators were 0.233 for context, 0.141 for input, 0.233 for process, and 0.394 for product.
    Conclusions The final indicator system has passed the consistency test and has scientific, comprehensive and good application value, which has guiding significance for the quality evaluation of undergraduate talent training in public health majors. The weight of the indicators suggests that the cultivation of public health talents be in line with social needs, and the strengthening of students' professional identity can better promote the development of the discipline.

     

/

返回文章
返回