高级检索
王欣欣, 贾存显, 张吉玉, 王东芳. 家庭亲密度和适应性与农村居民自杀关系[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2012, 28(2): 172-174. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws-2012-28-02-20
引用本文: 王欣欣, 贾存显, 张吉玉, 王东芳. 家庭亲密度和适应性与农村居民自杀关系[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2012, 28(2): 172-174. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws-2012-28-02-20
WANG Xin-xin, JIA Cun-xian, ZANG Ji-yu, . Association between family cohesion,adaptability and suicide among rural residents[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2012, 28(2): 172-174. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws-2012-28-02-20
Citation: WANG Xin-xin, JIA Cun-xian, ZANG Ji-yu, . Association between family cohesion,adaptability and suicide among rural residents[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2012, 28(2): 172-174. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws-2012-28-02-20

家庭亲密度和适应性与农村居民自杀关系

Association between family cohesion,adaptability and suicide among rural residents

  • 摘要: 目的 了解家庭亲密度和适应性与农村自杀的关系,为制定自杀干预措施提供科学依据。方法采用自行设计一般情况调查表以及家庭亲密度和适应性量表中文版(FACESⅡ-CV),对2008年9月1日-2009年8月31日在山东省邹城、莒南和高唐3县25个乡镇收集的200例自杀死亡者以及按1:1配比原则抽取的200名非自杀对照组人群的信息人进行面访调查。结果 自杀组家庭亲密度和家庭适应性得分分别为(74.83±13.14)和(57.46±9.59)分,均高于对照组的(65.82±14.64)和(50.72±14.17)分,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01);自杀组平衡型、中间型和极端型3种家庭类型分别占13.5%2、6.0%和60.5%,对照组3种家庭类型分别占27.5%2、3.5%和49.0%2,组家庭类型间差异有统计学意义(χ2=12.299,P<0.01);多因素条件Logistic回归分析结果表明,非在婚、精神疾病、经历过负性生活事件和极端型家庭类型是农村居民自杀发生的危险因素;党/团员和家庭年均收入较高是农村自杀发生的保护因素。结论 农村自杀死亡者的家庭亲密度和适应性存在缺陷;极端型家庭更易发生自杀行为。

     

    Abstract: Objective To explore the relationship between family cohesion,adaptability and suicide among rural residents and to provide reference for suicide prevention and intervention. Methods With paired case-control study,25 towns from 3 counties in Shandong province were randomly selected.Case group was the suicide happened from Sept 1, 2008 to Aug 31,2009 in the 25 towns.Controls were normal persons matched with same age(no more than 3 years), gender,and same or neighbor village as suicide cases.The data of 200 suicide cases and 200 paired controls were collected with psychological autopsy method. Results There were significant differences between suicide and control groups in family cohesion(74.83±13.14 vs 65.82±14.64)and adaptability(57.46±9.59 vs 50.72±14.17).The percents of balance, intermediate,extreme family type in suicide group were 13.5%,26.0%,and 60.5%,respectively.The percents of those three family types in the control group were 27.5%,23.5%,and 49.0%,respectively,and the family type was associated with suicide(χ2=12.299,P<0.01).Multivariate conditional logistic regression model analyses showed that single,mental illness,experiencing negative life event,and extreme family type were risk factors of suicide.Party/league member,having high family income were protective factors of suicide. Conclusion There are defects in family cohesion and adaptability among the suicides.The persons in a family of extreme type are more likely to have suicide behavior.

     

/

返回文章
返回