高级检索
赵久波, 滕姗, 张小远, 赵静波, 杨雪岭, 陈洁. 大学生性取向变化及其影响因素[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2018, 34(4): 563-566. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1116164
引用本文: 赵久波, 滕姗, 张小远, 赵静波, 杨雪岭, 陈洁. 大学生性取向变化及其影响因素[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2018, 34(4): 563-566. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1116164
Jiu-bo ZHAO, Shan TENG, Xiao-yuan ZHANG, . Change in sexual orientation identity and its influencing factors among college students[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2018, 34(4): 563-566. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1116164
Citation: Jiu-bo ZHAO, Shan TENG, Xiao-yuan ZHANG, . Change in sexual orientation identity and its influencing factors among college students[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2018, 34(4): 563-566. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1116164

大学生性取向变化及其影响因素

Change in sexual orientation identity and its influencing factors among college students

  • 摘要:
      目的  了解大学生性取向变化特点及其影响因素。
      方法  选取某大学学生2 291人,采用自编人口社会学问卷与儿童期创伤问卷(CTQ-SF),分别于2014年11月与2016年11月进行前测与后测调查。
      结果  同性恋、双性恋与性取向不确定者前测总人数为96人(4.19 %),后测总人数为177人(7.73 %);性取向发生变化者占总人数的7.94 %,其中双性恋者较多发生性取向变化(χ2 = 680.14,P < 0.001);女性性取向变化多于男性(χ2 = 5.74,P < 0.05),独生子女性取向变化多于非独生子女(χ2 = 15.59,P < 0.001),家居大城市者性取向变化多于居住于其他地方者(χ2 = 17.72,P < 0.001),无留守经历的个体性取向变化多于有留守经历者(χ2 = 6.26,P < 0.05),父亲、母亲文化程度越高者性取向变化越多(χ2 = 12.71、χ2 = 14.53,均P < 0.01);性取向变化者儿童期性虐待、情感虐待、情感忽视得分显著高于性取向稳定者(均P < 0.05);logistic回归分析显示,性别(OR = 0.679)、是否为独生子女(OR = 0.611)、家庭居住地(OR = 1.198)和儿童期情感虐待(OR = 1.174)等是性取向变化的主要影响因素。
      结论  双性恋、女性、独生子女、家居大城市、无留守经历、父母亲文化程度高的个体性取向更加不稳定,且性别、是否为独生子女、家庭居住地和儿童期情感虐待是性取向变化的主要影响因素。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective  To examine the change in sexual orientation identity and its influencing factors among college students.
      Methods  We conducted a two-wave survey among 2 291 college students selected with cluster sampling in a university in November 2014 and 2016. A self-designed demography and sexual orientation questionnaire and the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire-Short Form (CTQ-SF) were used in the survey.
      Results  Totally 96 (4.19%) and 177 (7.73%) of the participants reported homosexual, bisexual and uncertain sexual orientation in the first- and second-wave survey. There were 7.94% of the participants reporting changes in sexual orientation during the 2-year period. Higher rate of sexual orientation change was reported by the participants with bisexual orientation (χ2 = 680.14, P < 0.001), female gender (χ2 = 5.74, P < 0.05), being only-child (χ2 = 15.59, P < 0.001), from families in big cities (χ2 = 17.72, P < 0.001), without left-behind experience (χ2 = 6.26, P < 0.05), and with higher maternal and paternal education level (χ2 = 12.71 and χ2 = 14.53, both P < 0.01) compared to the participants with other sexual orientation, male gender, non-only child, from families in other regions, being non only-child, with left-behind experience, and lower maternal and paternal education level. The scores of childhood abuse, emotional abuse and neglect were higher among the participants reporting the change in sexual orientation than those not reporting the change (P < 0.05 for all).The results of logistic regression analysis showed that male gender (odds ratio OR = 0.679), being a non only-child (OR = 0.611), from a family in a big city (OR = 1.198), and with more childhood emotional abuse (OR = 1.174) were main influencing factors of changes in sexual orientation.
      Conclusion  The sexual orientation is more unstable among the college students with bisexual orientation, female gender, being only-child, from families in big cities, without left-behind experience, with higher maternal and paternal education level; gender, whether being a only-child, familial residence, and childhood emotional abuse are main influencing factors of sexual orientation change in college students.

     

/

返回文章
返回