高级检索
罗志, 吴霞, 刘佳佳, 杨丽华, 郎琅, 陈颍川, 朵林. 中国社会组织参与缅甸北部跨境卫生活动优势与挑战[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2018, 34(11): 1549-1551. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1116663
引用本文: 罗志, 吴霞, 刘佳佳, 杨丽华, 郎琅, 陈颍川, 朵林. 中国社会组织参与缅甸北部跨境卫生活动优势与挑战[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2018, 34(11): 1549-1551. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1116663
Zhi LUO, Xia WU, Jia-jia LIU, . Advantages and challenges for Chinese social organizations′ involvement in cross-border health activities in northern Myanmar[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2018, 34(11): 1549-1551. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1116663
Citation: Zhi LUO, Xia WU, Jia-jia LIU, . Advantages and challenges for Chinese social organizations′ involvement in cross-border health activities in northern Myanmar[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2018, 34(11): 1549-1551. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1116663

中国社会组织参与缅甸北部跨境卫生活动优势与挑战

Advantages and challenges for Chinese social organizations′ involvement in cross-border health activities in northern Myanmar

  • 摘要:
      目的  对比缅甸北部地区中国和外国社会组织开展卫生服务情况及特点,分析中国社会组织医疗方式跨境服务缅北的优势及挑战。
      方法  2016年8 — 12月以中缅边境缅甸一侧7个边境口岸为调查点,以民政注册社会组织为调查对象进行横断面调查;文献查询结合多部门访谈,收集缅北中外主要社会组织机构地点、项目内容、资金来源、当地注册协议等情况。
      结果  共调查参与缅甸北部医疗卫生合作的9个国外及2个国内社会组织,国外社会组织分布中缅边境缅甸一侧各口岸,机构在缅甸注册,得到长期资金支持,有办公室及专业人员管理。中国社会组织上述方面与国外社会组织存在较大差异,但中国社会组织有地域接壤及中方边境一侧广布卫生设施和资源支持优势,有同宗族跨境民族及缅甸大量中资公司作为服务平台优势。中国社会组织较易开展跨境卫生合作并产生影响。
      结论  中国社会组织可以学习国外社会组织经验,发挥自身优势和“民间外交”特点,实效推动跨境“一带一路”卫生活动。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective  To examine the status and characteristics of health services supplied by Chinese and foreign social organizations in northern Myanmar and to analyze advantages and challenges for Chinese social organizations′ involvement in the cross-border health activities.
      Methods  We selected 7 frontier ports as study sites in northern Myanmar along China border; then we conducted a cross-sectional survey including relevant data collection and structured interviews among the staff of main Chinese and other foreign social organizations registered at the study sites between August and December 2016. The collected information of the organizations included registration place, project content, financial source, and agreement with local officials.
      Results  Totally 9 foreign and 2 Chinese social organizations were surveyed in the study. All the foreign social organizations located in the 7 study areas and were with registration place in Burma, long-term financial support, administration facilities, and management personnel; while the 2 Chinese social organizations showed obvious differences in the 5 aspects mentioned above. The advantages in the participation of cross-border health activities for the 2 Chinese social organizations included geographically adjacent location, having abundant support of health facilities and manpower resource in border regions of China, and with a special service platform owing to the existence of cross-border clan populations and many Chinese-funded companies in Burma and the advantages could made the Chinese social organizations being much more easily and effectively to carry out cross-border health activities.
      Conclusion  Chinese social organizations could learn from experiences of foreign social organizations and give full play to their advantages in the participation of cross-border health activities.

     

/

返回文章
返回