高级检索
索朗德吉, 李亚杰, 拉巴卓玛, 国胜. 2015年西藏居民健康素养监测结果分析[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2019, 35(9): 1235-1237. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1116813
引用本文: 索朗德吉, 李亚杰, 拉巴卓玛, 国胜. 2015年西藏居民健康素养监测结果分析[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2019, 35(9): 1235-1237. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1116813
Suolangdeji, Ya-jie LI, Labazhuoma, Sheng Guo. Health literacy among Tibet residents, 2015: surveillance results[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2019, 35(9): 1235-1237. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1116813
Citation: Suolangdeji, Ya-jie LI, Labazhuoma, Sheng Guo. Health literacy among Tibet residents, 2015: surveillance results[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2019, 35(9): 1235-1237. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1116813

2015年西藏居民健康素养监测结果分析

Health literacy among Tibet residents, 2015: surveillance results

  • 摘要:
      目的  了解西藏居民健康素养水平,分析居民健康素养影响因素,确定优先工作领域,为各级政府和卫生计生行政部门进行健康决策提供参考。
      方法  采取多阶段分层整群抽样和PPS抽样方法抽取西藏居民1 739人,采用《全国居民健康素养监测调查问卷》,由经过统一培训且考核合格的工作人员进行入户调查。
      结果  2015年西藏居民健康素养水平为0.17 %,基本知识和理念、健康生活方式与行为、健康技能3个方面健康素养具备率分别是1.55 %、0.29 %、1.04 %;安全与急救、传染病防治、科学健康观、基本医疗、健康信息、慢性病防治6类健康问题健康素养水平依次是8.57 %、4.72 %、4.03 %、3.39 %、3.22 %、0.35 %。2015年西藏居民健康素养得分为(21.76 ± 9.66)分;不同性别、民族居民健康素养得分差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05),城市居民健康素养得分高于农村居民(P < 0.001),随文化程度提高健康素养增高(P < 0.001);年龄 ≥ 60岁、常住人口数 ≥ 7人、农民、家庭年收入 < 1万元的居民健康素养得分较低,分别低于其他分类组居民(P < 0.05)。
      结论  2015年西藏居民健康素养水平较低,不同人群特征的居民健康素养水平存在差异,应加大健康教育和健康促进力度,进一步提高西藏居民健康知识知晓率,态度持有率和行为形成率。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective  To explore the status and influencing factors of health literacy among Tibet residents and to provide references for determining priorities and making health policies by governmental agencies at different administration levels.
      Methods  Using stratified multistage cluster sampling and proportional to population size sampling, we conducted a household survey among 1 739 permanent residents aged 15 – 69 years in Tibet Autonomous Region between August and December 2015. The National Questionnaire of Health Literacy for Residents was adopted in the survey.
      Results  Among the participants, the level of overall health literacy was 0.17%; the health literacy levels were 1.55% for basic health knowledge and ideas, 0.29% for healthy lifestyle and behavior, and 1.04% for health skills; and the levels of health literacy about 6 categories of health problems were 8.57% for safety and first aid, 4.72% for infectious disease prevention and control, 4.03% for scientific health concept, 3.39% for basic medical treatment, 3.22% for health information, and 0.35% for chronic disease prevention and treatment, respectively. The health literacy score for all the participants was 21.76 ± 9.66. There were no gender and between ethnic group differences in the score (both P > 0.05); whereas, the score of urban participants was significantly higher than that of the rural participants (P < 0.05) and the score increased with educational level significantly (P < 0.001). The participants aged 60 years and elder, with 7 or more family members, being a farmer, and having the annual family income of less than 10 000 RMB Yuan showed significantly lower health literacy scores compared to other participants (P < 0.05 for all).
      Conclusion  Health literacy level of Tibet residents in 2015 was low and the level differed by demographic factors. The study results suggest that health education and promotion should be enhanced among Tibet residents.

     

/

返回文章
返回