高级检索
王蕾, 崔颖, 蒋燕, 侯芊, 苏潇歌. 12320卫生热线考核与评价实证分析[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2019, 35(1): 111-114. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1118392
引用本文: 王蕾, 崔颖, 蒋燕, 侯芊, 苏潇歌. 12320卫生热线考核与评价实证分析[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2019, 35(1): 111-114. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1118392
Lei WANG, Ying CUI, Yan JIANG, . Assessment and evaluation on performance of 12320 health hotline: an empirical research[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2019, 35(1): 111-114. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1118392
Citation: Lei WANG, Ying CUI, Yan JIANG, . Assessment and evaluation on performance of 12320 health hotline: an empirical research[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2019, 35(1): 111-114. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1118392

12320卫生热线考核与评价实证分析

Assessment and evaluation on performance of 12320 health hotline: an empirical research

  • 摘要:
      目的  对12320卫生热线考核评价指标体系进行实证研究,以验证12320卫生热线考核评价指标体系的科学性与可行性,了解12320卫生热线工作开展情况及存在问题。
      方法  结合12320卫生热线考核评价指标体系及权重,设计相应的12320卫生热线考核评价评分表,于2014年11 — 12月,在全国范围内选取9个地区的12320卫生热线,根据12320卫生热线考核评价表进行综合考评,并使用TOPSIS法进行评价。
      结果  9个地区12320卫生热线TOPSIS法排序前三名分别是C地区(Ci值 = 0.5964)、E地区(Ci值 = 0.4493)、F地区(Ci值 = 0.4330),考核评价表综合评价结果排序结果前三名分别是C地区(97.67分)、E地区(92.56分)、F地区(92.54分),两种评价方法的评价结果基本一致,Spearman相关系数为0.75(P < 0.05),呈正相关。
      讨论  12320卫生热线考核评价指标体系科学有效,具有一定的操作适宜性和使用价值,各地12320卫生热线仍需进一步完善规章制度,确保稳定的专项经费投入以及注重人才培养。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective  To verify the scientificity and feasibility of an index system for performance evaluation of 12320 health hotline and to examine proceeding situation and existing problems of 12320 health hotline.
      Methods  We established an assessment scale for performance of 12320 health hotline based on contents and weight of indicators in current evaluation index system. Then we conducted a survey on performance of 12320 health hotline in 9 regions (namely from region A to region Ⅰ) across China with technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS) method during November to December 2014.
      Results  For the nine 12320 health hotline in different regions, the top three with better performance based on TOPSIS evaluation were in the region C, E, and F and the calculated closeness degree value (Ci) for the three were 0.5964, 0.4493, and 0.4330; while, according to the evaluation using the assessment scale established, the top three were the same as those of TOPSIS evaluation, with the overall performance scores of 97.67, 92.56, and 92.54 for the three in region C, E, and F, respectively. The performance evaluation results from the two methods were basically consistent for the 12320 health hotline in the 9 regions and the Spearman correlation coefficient for the evaluation indicators of the two methods is 0.75 (P < 0.05).
      Conclusion  The established assessment scale for evaluation of 12320 health hotline performance is of operability and applicability. The results from evaluations of the assessment scale and TOPSIS method suggest that the current performance of 12320 health hotline needs to be improved.

     

/

返回文章
返回