高级检索
范北方, 何倩, 朱闵敏, 谢博, 程璐, 陈颜, 郭蓝, 李泽辉. 应对方式在外来务工人员社会支持与负性情绪的中介效应[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2019, 35(5): 636-640. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1122533
引用本文: 范北方, 何倩, 朱闵敏, 谢博, 程璐, 陈颜, 郭蓝, 李泽辉. 应对方式在外来务工人员社会支持与负性情绪的中介效应[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2019, 35(5): 636-640. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1122533
Bei-fang FAN, Qian HE, Min-min ZHU, . Mediating effect of coping style on association of social support with negative emotion among migrant workers[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2019, 35(5): 636-640. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1122533
Citation: Bei-fang FAN, Qian HE, Min-min ZHU, . Mediating effect of coping style on association of social support with negative emotion among migrant workers[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2019, 35(5): 636-640. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1122533

应对方式在外来务工人员社会支持与负性情绪的中介效应

Mediating effect of coping style on association of social support with negative emotion among migrant workers

  • 摘要:
    目的 探讨应对方式在外来务工人员社会支持与负性情绪间的中介作用。
    方法 于2018年7 — 9月,随机抽取广东省深圳市南山区1所企业,并对该企业中所有≥18岁的非深户务工人员777人,采用自制量表、社会支持量表(SRSS)等进行问卷调查。
    结果 南山区外来务工人员可能有中度及以上抑郁人数43(5.5 %);可能有中度及以上焦虑的人数21(2.7 %)ULS-6平均得分为(9.5 ± 3.6)分。结构方程模型结果显示,社会支持对负性情绪水平发挥直接影响(β = – 0.51,P < 0.001),社会支持对消极应对方式发挥直接影响(β = – 0.11,P = 0.023),消极应对方式对负性情绪水平发挥直接影响(β = 0.30,P < 0.001)。Bootstrap法验证了消极应对方式在外来务工人员社会支持与负性情绪间有中介效应。
    结论 外来务工人员的社会支持水平通过应对方式影响负性情绪。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To explore mediating effect of coping style on the correlation between social support and negative emotion among migrant workers.
    Methods We conducted a survey in a enterprise in Shenzhen city of Guangdong province from July to September 2018; all the enterprise's employees (n = 777) without household registration of Shenzhen city were asked to complete Social Support Rating Scale (SRSS), Simplified Coping Style Questionnaire (SCSQ), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7), University of California Los Angeles Loneliness Scale-6 (ULS-6), and a self-designed questionnaire.
    Results Of the participants, 43 (5.5%) were assessed as having moderate or serve depression and 21 (2.7%) as having moderate or serve anxiety; the mean ULS-6 score of the participants was 9.5 ± 3.6. The results of the structural equation model indicated that social support has a direct impact on both negative emotion (β = – 0.51, P < 0.001) and negative coping style (β = – 0.11, P = 0.023); while negative coping style has a direct impact on negative emotion level (β = 0.30, P < 0.001). Bootstrap analysis revealed a mediating effect of negative coping style on the correlation between social support and negative emotion among the participants.
    Conclusion Perceived social support affects negative emotion through coping style among migrant workers.

     

/

返回文章
返回