高级检索
肖力, 温贤秀, 李加冕, 张娟, 夏琪, 王珏岚, 徐嫚, 陈夏丹. 新冠肺炎疫情下武汉市一线医务人员防护用具使用相关皮肤不良反应现状调查[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2020, 36(6): 963-967. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1129163
引用本文: 肖力, 温贤秀, 李加冕, 张娟, 夏琪, 王珏岚, 徐嫚, 陈夏丹. 新冠肺炎疫情下武汉市一线医务人员防护用具使用相关皮肤不良反应现状调查[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2020, 36(6): 963-967. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1129163
Li XIAO, Xian-xiu WEN, Jia-mian LI, . Adverse skin reactions associated with personal protective equipment use among front-line medical staff during COVID-19 epidemic control in Wuhan city[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2020, 36(6): 963-967. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1129163
Citation: Li XIAO, Xian-xiu WEN, Jia-mian LI, . Adverse skin reactions associated with personal protective equipment use among front-line medical staff during COVID-19 epidemic control in Wuhan city[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2020, 36(6): 963-967. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1129163

新冠肺炎疫情下武汉市一线医务人员防护用具使用相关皮肤不良反应现状调查

Adverse skin reactions associated with personal protective equipment use among front-line medical staff during COVID-19 epidemic control in Wuhan city

  • 摘要:
      目的  了解新型冠状病毒肺炎(新冠肺炎)疫情下湖北省武汉市一线医务人员防护用具使用相关皮肤不良反应现状,为制定相应的职业防护策略提供参考依据。
      方法  于2020年2月13 — 20日采用便利抽样方法在武汉市10家新冠肺炎定点医院抽取325名一线医务人员进行网络问卷调查。
      结果  武汉市325名一线医务人员中,有243名医务人员使用防护用具后出现皮肤不良反应,皮肤不良反应发生率为74.77 %;其中76人(31.3 %)未对皮肤问题进行处理,仅21人(8.6 %)向专业医生寻求帮助。使用口罩、防护手套、防护服和防护鞋套的一线医务人员分别报告出现586、241、38和24例次皮肤不良反应,皮肤不良反应发生率分别为69.54 %(226/325)、34.58 %(111/321)、7.57 %(24/317)和2.94 %(9/306)。多因素非条件logistic回归分析结果显示,武汉市使用防护用具时间 > 4 h/d的一线医务人员发生皮肤不良反应的风险为使用防护用具时间 ≤ 4 h/d一线医务人员的2.307倍(OR = 2.307,95 % CI = 1.037~5.314),接受过皮肤职业防护培训的一线医务人员出现皮肤不良反应的风险为未接受过皮肤职业防护培训一线医务人员的0.457倍(OR = 0.457,95 % CI = 0.272~0.768)。
      结论  武汉市一线医务人员防护用具使用相关皮肤不良反应的发生率较高,使用防护用具时间和是否接受过皮肤职业防护培训是医务人员防护用具使用相关皮肤不良反应发生的主要影响因素。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective  To estimate the incidence of adverse skin reactions (ASRs) related to personal protective equipment (PPE) use among front-line medical staff during coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic control in Wuhan city and to provide references for developing occupational protection strategies.
      Methods  Using convenient sampling, we conducted an online questionnaire survey among 325 medical staff engaged in front-line COVID-19 epidemic control work at 10 hospitals in Wuhan city during February 13 – 20, 2020.
      Results  Among all the respondents, 243 (74.77%) experienced ASRs after using PPE; of which, 76 (31.1%) did not treated the illness and only 21 (8.6%) sought help from professionals. The reported number of ASRs associated with the usage of masks, gloves, gowns and shoe covers were 586, 241, 38, and 24 and the reported incidence of the ASRs associated with the usage of the four kinds of PPE were 69.54% (226/325), 34.58% (111/321), 7.57% (24/317), and 2.94% (9/306), respectively. The results of logistic regression analysis revealed that compared to those using PPE ≤ 4 hours per day, the medical staff using PPE more than 4 hours per day were more likely to have ASRs (odds ratio OR = 2.307, 95% confidence interval 95% CI: 1.037 – 5.314); while, the medical staff ever receiving trainings on occupational skin protection were less likely to have ASRs (OR = 0.457, 95% CI: 0.272 – 0.768) in comparison with those not receiving the trainings.
      Conclusion  The incidence of adverse skin reactions related to use of personal protective equipment is relatively high among medical staff engaged in front-line COVID-19 epidemic control work and the incidence is mainly influenced by the time of the equipment use and whether receiving training on occupational skin protection.

     

/

返回文章
返回