高级检索
曾新颖, 邸新博, 南奕, 谢慧宇, 孟子达, 肖琳, 刘世炜. 中国室内工作场所禁烟规定对职业人群吸烟行为影响[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2023, 39(6): 730-733. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1139721
引用本文: 曾新颖, 邸新博, 南奕, 谢慧宇, 孟子达, 肖琳, 刘世炜. 中国室内工作场所禁烟规定对职业人群吸烟行为影响[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2023, 39(6): 730-733. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1139721
ZENG Xinying, DI Xinbo, NAN Yi, XIE Huiyu, MENG Zida, XIAO Lin, LIU Shiwei. Effect of indoor workplace smoking ban regulation on smoking behavior among occupational populations in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2023, 39(6): 730-733. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1139721
Citation: ZENG Xinying, DI Xinbo, NAN Yi, XIE Huiyu, MENG Zida, XIAO Lin, LIU Shiwei. Effect of indoor workplace smoking ban regulation on smoking behavior among occupational populations in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2023, 39(6): 730-733. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1139721

中国室内工作场所禁烟规定对职业人群吸烟行为影响

Effect of indoor workplace smoking ban regulation on smoking behavior among occupational populations in China

  • 摘要:
      目的  了解中国室内工作场所禁烟规定对职业人群吸烟行为的影响,为评估和推进我国室内工作场所无烟化提供参考依据。
      方法  收集2018年中国成人烟草调查中在室内场所工作的5 795名职业人群的相关数据,并采用多因素非条件logistic回归模型分析工作场所禁烟规定对职业人群吸烟行为的影响。
      结果  中国5 795名职业人群中,室内工作场所非全面禁烟者3153人(54.4%),有全面禁烟规定者2642人(45.6%);在室内工作场所非全面禁烟的3153名职业人群中,在其室内工作场所看到有吸烟行为者2324人,加权后比例为75.9%;在室内工作场所全面禁烟的2642名职业人群中,在其室内工作场所看到有吸烟行为者743人,加权后比例为27.3%;在控制了性别、年龄、职业、居住地、地区、是否现在吸烟、是否支持工作场所禁烟和是否认为二手烟危害健康等混杂因素后,多因素非条件logistic回归分析结果显示,室内工作场所全面禁烟职业人群在其室内工作场所看到有吸烟行为者比例为室内工作场所非全面禁烟职业人群的0.14倍(OR = 0.14,95%CI = 0.12~0.17)。
      结论  室内工作场所全面禁烟可减少职业人群在其室内工作场所吸烟行为的发生。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective  To examine the impact of indoor workplace smoking ban regulation on smoking behavior among various occupation groups in different regions of China, and to provide a reference for evaluating and promoting smoke-free indoor workplaces.
      Methods  The data on 5 795 persons working in indoor places were collected from the National Adult Tobacco Survey conducted in 2018 across China. Unconditional multivariate logistic regression analysis was adopted to analyze the effect of indoor workplace smoking ban regulation on smoking behavior among occupational groups.
      Results  Non-comprehensive and comprehensive smoking prohibition in indoor workplace were reported by 3 153 (54.4%) and 2 642 (45.6%) of all the employed persons. Of the 3 153 employed persons working in indoor places without comprehensive smoking prohibition, 2 324 reported ever having seen someone (including themselves) smoking in workplace, with a weighted ratio of 75.9%; while of the 2 642 employed person working in indoor places with comprehensive smoking prohibition, 743 reported ever having seen someone smoking in workplace, with the weighted ratio of 27.3%. After adjusting for gender, age, occupation, living area (urban/rural), residence region (eastern/western), current smoking, attitude towards smoking prohibition in workplace, and awareness of health hazards associated with second-hand smoke, the results of logistic regression analysis showed that the employed persons working in indoor places without comprehensive smoking prohibition were less likely to have seen someone smoking in indoor workplace (odds ratio = 0.14, 95% confidence interval: 0.12 – 0.17).
      Conclusion  Comprehensive indoor workplace smoking prohibition could reduce indoor smoking among occupational persons.

     

/

返回文章
返回