一起由Omicron变异株BA.5.2引起的义乌市新冠病毒感染疫情传播特征分析

王笑笑; 王凤英; 朱列波; 龚震宇; 何寒青; 戚小华; 古雪; 罗明宇; 庞志峰; 董选军; 俞敏

doi:10.11847/zgggws1141188

一起由Omicron变异株BA.5.2引起的义乌市新冠病毒感染疫情传播特征分析

doi: 10.11847/zgggws1141188

1.
浙江省疾病预防控制中心，杭州 310051
2.
金华市疾病预防控制中心
3.
义乌市疾病预防控制中心

基金项目: 2022年度浙江省重点研发计划（2022C03184）、浙江省金华市科学技术项目（2021 – 4 – 238）

详细信息

作者简介:
王笑笑（1982 – ），女，浙江人，博士，副主任医师，主要从事传染病防控工作

通讯作者:
俞敏，Email：myu@cdc.zj.cn

中图分类号: R 183
计量
- 文章访问数: 226
- HTML全文浏览量: 69
- PDF下载量: 50
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 接收日期: 2022-12-29
- 网络出版日期: 2023-02-01
- 刊出日期: 2023-04-10

Transmission characteristics of a COVID-19 outbreak caused by Omicron variant BA.5.2 in Yiwu city, China

1.
Zhejiang Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province 310051, China

摘要

摘要: 目的对浙江省义乌市一起由Omicron变异株BA.5.2引起的新冠病毒感染疫情的传播特征进行分析。方法将2022年8月2日 — 8月21日义乌市新冠病毒感染疫情所涉及的感染者为研究对象，收集流行病学调查、实验室检测、临床症状等信息，分析家庭续发率、传染性代际（transmission generations ,TG）、序列间隔（serial interval, SI）、感染者出现临床症状到核酸检测阳性间隔时间、实时再生数R_t等反映疫情传播特征指标。结果该起疫情为指示病例发病前7 d有外省高风险区域旅居史和外省阳性感染者的密切接触史后引入义乌市，基因测序显示病毒属于VOC/Omicron（BA.5.2进化分支）变异株。共报告713例感染者，疫情持续20 d。男性343例，女性370例。年龄M（P₂₅，P₇₅）为33（20，74）岁。义乌市除赤岸镇外的13个街道均有病例报告。家庭聚集性疫情138起（74.2%），涉及425例感染者；在传播关系明确的101起家庭聚集性疫情中，家庭续发率为62.2%（95%CI：56.5%～67.5%），家庭成员全部续发的家庭占39.6%（40/101），其中引入病例和197例续发病例TG的M（P₂₅，P₇₅）为1.7（1.0，2.8）d，TG ≤ 2 d的感染者所占50.8%；在65起家庭聚集性疫情中，引入病例和99例续发病例均出现了临床症状，SI的M（P₂₅，P₇₅）为2.0（1.0，3.0）d，SI ≤ 2 d的感染者占44.4%。开展个案流行病学调查时364例（51.1%）感染者自述出现临床症状，以发热（64.3 %）、咳嗽（23.4%）、咽痛咽干（20.1%）为主。感染者出现临床症状到核酸检测阳性的时间间隔M（P₂₅，P₇₅）为0（0，1）d，124例（34.1%）在出现临床症状后检出核酸阳性，滞后时间以1 d为主（67.7%），其次为间隔2 d（22.6%）。未发现核酸滞后与非滞后组之间性别、年龄、采样方式、采样时间段、Ct值的差异。疫情初期时实时再生数（R_t）最高为6.18，在采取防控措施1周后（8月9日）降至1以下。结论本起由Omicron变异株BA.5.2引起的新冠病毒感染疫情传播特征表现为家庭续发率高，传染性代际和序列间隔短，且存在较高比例的核酸阳性滞后于症状感染者，隐匿性强。
- 新型冠状病毒 /
- Omicron变异株 /
- 家庭续发率 /
- 传染性代际 /
- 序列间隔
Abstract: Objective To analyze transmission characteristics of a coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak caused by Omicron variant BA.5.2 in Yiwu city of Zhejiang province, China. Methods Medical records and the information on epidemiological investigation, laboratory tests were collected for all local COVID-19 cases diagnosed during August 2 – 21, 2022 – a period of an COVID-19 outbreak in Yiwu city. The transmission characteristics of the outbreak was analyzed using indicators including family secondary attack rate, transmission generations (TG), serial interval (SI), the time interval from symptom onset to positive nucleic acid test, as well as time-varying reproduction number (R_t). Results The indicator case of the outbreak was confirmed with the history of living in high-risk area of other provinces and close contact with COVID-19 infected persons 7 days before the onset of disease symptoms. Genome sequencing of the virus isolated from the indicator case's secondary cases indicated that the viral strain of the outbreak was severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron variant BA.5.2. Totally 713 cases (343 males and 370 females) from 13 subdistricts (except for Chi'an township) of Yiwu city were confirmed during the outbreak lasting for 20 days. The median age of the cases (percentile 25 [P₂₅], percentile 75[P₇₅]) was 33 (20, 74) years. A total of 138 household clusters (involving 74.2% of all infections) were identified in the outbreak. For the 101 household clusters with clear transmission chain, the secondary attack rate was 62.2% (95% confidence interval: 56.5% – 67.5%); 39.6% of the household clusters affected all family members of the households involved; the median TG (P₂₅, P₇₅) was 1.7 (1.0, 2.8) days for the primary cases and 197 secondary cases and the TG was equal or less than 2 days for 50.8% of the cases being involved. For 65 household clusters, the median SI (P₂₅, P₇₅) was 2.0 （1.0, 3.0）days for the primary cases and 99 secondary cases with clinic symptoms and the SI was equal or less than 2 days for 44.4% of the cases being involved. Of the 364 cases (51.1% of the cases undergoing epidemiological surveys) with self-reported symptoms, 64.3%, 23.4%, and 20.1% reported fever, cough, and sore/dry throat, respectively. For the 364 symptomatic cases, the median time interval (P₂₅, P₇₅) from symptom onset to positive nucleic acid test was 0（0, 1）day and the time interval was one day for 67.7% of the cases and two days for 22.6% of the cases. No significant differences were observed in gender, age, site and daily time point of specimen sampling for nucleic acid test, and cycle threshold (Ct) value between the cases with and without lag time (day) of positive nucleic acid test from symptom onset. The maximum R_t was 6.18 in early period of the COVID-19 outbreak and the R_t decreased to less than one week after the implementation of containment measures. Conclusion The COVID-19 outbreak caused by Omicron variant BA.5.2 was characterized by high family secondary attack rate, short transmission generation and serial interval, and a high proportion of cases with lag time of positive nucleic acid test from symptom onset.
- COVID-19 virus /
- Omicron variant /
- family secondary attack rate /
- transmission generation /
- serial interval

HTML全文

图 1 Omicron变异株BA.5.2疫情流行曲线

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 传染性代际、序列间隔传播链示意和时间分布图

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 出现临床症状至核酸检出阳性间隔时间分布

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 3例感染者具有传染性至核酸检出阳性间隔时间

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 实时再生数（R_t）变化趋势

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 聚集性疫情分布情况

疫情类别	起数	构成比（%）	例数 ^a
家庭聚集性	138	74.2	425
夜市聚集性	1	0.5	118
企业/工厂聚集性	26	14.0	114
菜场聚集性	3	1.6	78
医疗机构/诊所聚集性	7	3.8	68
商场/商贸城聚集性	2	1.1	28
其他聚集性	9	4.8	20
注：a 不同聚集性疫情之间存在病例交叉。

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 核酸滞后组与非滞后组比较

项目	核酸滞后组		非核酸滞后组		统计值（χ²/Z/t）	P 值
项目	人数	%	人数	%	统计值（χ²/Z/t）	P 值
性别					0.621	0.431
男	53	31.9	113	68.1
女	71	35.9	127	64.1
年龄 ^a	30	（16.5，38）	32	（20，40）	– 0.626	0.531
采样方式					0.723	0.395
隔离点发现	96	35.3	176	64.7
非隔离点发现	28	30.4	64	69.6
采样时间段 ^b					0.178	0.673
非高温时间	78	34.1	151	65.9
高温时间（10:00-17:00）	32	31.7	69	68.3
Ct 值 ^a
N	27.5	（21.4，31.5）	28.2	（22.6，32.0）	1.658	0.097
O	28.7	（23.2，33.3）	29.1	（24.8，34.0）	1.689	0.091
注：a 采用M（P₂₅，P₇₅）表示；b 因未收集到采样时间段缺失34例。

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(28)

[1]	World Health Organization. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic[EB/OL]. (2023 – 01 – 03). https://covid19.who.int/.
[2]	Viana R, Moyo S, Amoako DG, et al. Rapid epidemic expansion of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant in southern Africa[J]. Nature, 2022, 603(7902): 679 – 686. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04411-y
[3]	World Health Organization. Tracking SARS-CoV-2 variants[EB/OL]. (2022 – 12 – 01). https://www.who.int/activities/tracking-SARS-CoV-2-variants.
[4]	Zhao S. Estimating the time interval between transmission generations when negative values occur in the serial interval data: using COVID-19 as an example[J]. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(4): 3512 – 3519. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020198
[5]	杜婧, 王佳敏, 王晶, 等. 北京市新型冠状病毒Omicron变异株的传播力研究[J]. 中华流行病学杂志, 2022, 43(9): 1364 – 1369. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112338-20220410-00274
[6]	Cori A, Ferguson NM, Fraser C, et al. A new framework and software to estimate time-varying reproduction numbers during epidemics[J]. American Journal of Epidemiology, 2013, 178(9): 1505 – 1512. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwt133
[7]	Liu Y, Eggo RM, Kucharski AJ. Secondary attack rate and superspreading events for SARS-CoV-2[J]. The Lancet, 2020, 395(10227): e47. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30462-1
[8]	Chan JFW, Yuan SF, Kok KH, et al. A familial cluster of pneumonia associated with the 2019 novel coronavirus indicating person-to-person transmission: a study of a family cluster[J]. The Lancet, 2020, 395(10223): 514 – 523. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30154-9
[9]	刘怡芳, 李佳萌, 周朋辉, 等. 天津市新型冠状病毒肺炎聚集性疫情病例分析[J]. 中华流行病学杂志, 2020, 41(5): 653 – 656. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112338-20200225-00165
[10]	景钦隆, 李泳光, 马蒙蒙, 等. 基于广州市聚集性疫情的新型冠状病毒传染力及续发率研究[J]. 中华流行病学杂志, 2020, 41(10): 1623 – 1626. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112338-20200310-00305
[11]	Luo L, Liu D, Liao XL, et al. Contact settings and risk for transmission in 3410 close contacts of patients with COVID-19 in Guangzhou, China: a prospective cohort study[J]. Annals of Internal Medicine, 2020, 173(11): 879 – 887. doi: 10.7326/M20-2671
[12]	Bi QF, Wu YS, Mei SJ, et al. Epidemiology and transmission of COVID-19 in 391 cases and 1286 of their close contacts in Shenzhen, China: a retrospective cohort study[J]. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 2020, 20(8): 911 – 919. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30287-5
[13]	Burke RM, Midgley CM, Dratch A, et al. Active monitoring of persons exposed to patients with confirmed COVID-19 – United States, January – February 2020[J]. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 2020, 69(9): 245 – 246. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6909e1
[14]	Laxminarayan R, Wahl B, Dudala SR, et al. Epidemiology and transmission dynamics of COVID-19 in two Indian states[J]. Science, 2020, 370(6517): 691 – 697. doi: 10.1126/science.abd7672
[15]	Song JS, Lee J, Kim M, et al. Serial intervals and household transmission of SARS-CoV-2 omicron variant, South Korea, 2021[J]. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 2022, 28(3): 756 – 759. doi: 10.3201/eid2803.212607
[16]	Araf Y, Akter F, Tang YD, et al. Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2: genomics, transmissibility, and responses to current COVID-19 vaccines[J]. Journal of Medical Virology, 2022, 94(5): 1825 – 1832. doi: 10.1002/jmv.27588
[17]	Torjesen I. Covid-19: Omicron may be more transmissible than other variants and partly resistant to existing vaccines, scientists fear[J]. BMJ, 2021, 375: n2943.
[18]	孙琬琬, 凌锋, 潘金仁, 等. 浙江省新型冠状病毒肺炎家庭聚集性疫情流行特征分析[J]. 中华预防医学杂志, 2020, 54(6): 625 – 629. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112150-20200227-00199
[19]	潘静静, 王莹莹, 王文华, 等. 一起由奥密克戎变异株BA. 2.2引起的河南省新冠肺炎本土疫情流行病学特征分析[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2022, 38(8): 975 – 979. doi: 10.11847/zgggws1138726
[20]	黄勇, 郑志伟, 陈纯, 等. 广州市2起由新型冠状病毒奥密克戎变异株引起的本地疫情流行病学参数研究[J]. 中华流行病学杂志, 2022, 43(11): 1705 – 1710. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112338-20220523-00450
[21]	Backer JA, Eggink D, Andeweg SP, et al. Shorter serial intervals in SARS-CoV-2 cases with Omicron BA. 1 variant compared with Delta variant, the Netherlands, 13 to 26 December 2021[J]. Eurosurveillance, 2022, 27(6): 2200042.
[22]	Del Águila-Mejía J, Wallmann R, Calvo-Montes J, et al. Secondary attack rate, transmission and incubation periods, and serial interval of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant, Spain[J]. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 2022, 28(6): 1224 – 1228. doi: 10.3201/eid2806.220158
[23]	李伟红, 潘阳, 冯兆民, 等. 新型冠状病毒奥密克戎变异株核酸检测试剂盒的检测效果比较[J]. 国际病毒学杂志, 2022, 29(3): 216 – 220. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4092.2022.03.008
[24]	Zhao HJ, Lu L, Peng Z, et al. SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant shows less efficient replication and fusion activity when compared with Delta variant in TMPRSS2-expressed cells[J]. Emerging Microbes and Infections, 2022, 11(1): 277 – 283. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2021.2023329
[25]	吕莹, 袁伟, 施冬玲, 等. 2019新型冠状病毒奥密克戎变异株感染者的临床特征分析[J]. 中华传染病杂志, 2022, 40(5): 257 – 263.
[26]	罗小娟, 王静, 黄晓霞, 等. 广西钦州市一起由奥密克戎BA.2变异株引起的新冠肺炎本土疫情流行病学特征[J/OL]. 疾病监测, doi : doi/10.3784/jbjc.202206220292. http://www.jbjc.org/article/doi/10.3784/jbjc.202206220292.
[27]	尚粉青, 陈月娥, 杨翰, 等. 新型冠状病毒奥密克戎变异株BA.2和BA.5亚型感染者的临床特征分析[J]. 中华结核和呼吸杂志, 2022, 45(12): 1199 – 1203. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112147-20220805-00653
[28]	李文艳, 杜志成, 王莹, 等. 新型冠状病毒Delta变异株引起的广州市荔湾区本土疫情流行特征分析[J]. 中华流行病学杂志, 2021, 42(10): 1763 – 1768. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112338-20210613-00472