高级检索
吴黎明, 陈长香, 李建民, 刘小平. 记忆障碍老年人记忆训练干预效果评价[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2010, 26(4): 409-410. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2010-26-04-14
引用本文: 吴黎明, 陈长香, 李建民, 刘小平. 记忆障碍老年人记忆训练干预效果评价[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2010, 26(4): 409-410. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2010-26-04-14
WU Li-ming, CHEN Chang-xiang, LI Jian-min, . Effect of memory training intervention on elderly dysmnesia[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2010, 26(4): 409-410. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2010-26-04-14
Citation: WU Li-ming, CHEN Chang-xiang, LI Jian-min, . Effect of memory training intervention on elderly dysmnesia[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2010, 26(4): 409-410. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2010-26-04-14

记忆障碍老年人记忆训练干预效果评价

Effect of memory training intervention on elderly dysmnesia

  • 摘要: 目的 评价记忆训练对记忆障碍老年人干预效果.方法 随机选取河北省唐山市社区60名Rivermead行为记忆测验第2版(RivermeadⅡ)评分<22分的老年人,随机分为干预组和对照组,每组各30人;干预组运用记忆训练方法进行训练干预,对照组无任何干预措施,3个月后通过评分评价干预效果.结果 干预后,干预组RivermeadⅡ标准分由(17.10±2.38)分提高到(19.90±2.17)分,立即回忆故事由(0.40±0.56)分提高到(0.93±0.79)分,信件即时、延迟回忆由(1.07±0.83)分提高到(1.63±0.62)分,脸部再认由(1.87±0.43)分提高到(1.93±0.25)分,定向由(1.70±1.37)分提高到(1.47±0.68)分,回忆预约由(1.17±0.79)分提高到(1.73±0.52)分,故事延迟回忆由(1.07±0.69)分提高到(1.57±0.57)分,回忆姓名由(0.70±0.84)分提高到(1.17±0.91)分,回忆被藏物品由(1.53±0.73)分提高到(1.90±0.31)分,分值均明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 本研究中记忆训练方法提高了记忆障碍老年人的行为记忆评分,改善了老年人记忆力.

     

    Abstract: Objective To evaluate the effect of memory training process on dysmnesia in elder people.Methods The test of the Riveunead Behaviouml Memory Test Second Edition(Riveunead Ⅱ)was carried out among 60 elderm emory inpaiunent people with scores less than 22.The elderly chosen at random in Tangshan communities were randomly divided into intervention group and control group with 30 people in each group.The intervention group was treated with the memory training process.The control group got no treahnent Three months later the effect of the intervention was evaluated.Results After the treahnen' the standard score increased from 17.10±2.38 to 19.90±2..17,and the subtest score of story inmediate recall increased from 0.40±0.56 to 0.93±0.79; inmediate and delayed message recall increased from 1.07±0.83 to 1.63±0.62; the face recognition increased from 1.87±0.43 to 1.93±0.25; the orientation increased from 1.70±0.37 to 1.47±0.68; the appoinhnent recall increased from 1.17±0.79 to 1.73±0.52; the story(delayed) recall increased from 1.07±.69 to 1.57±0.57; the second names increased from 0.70±0.84 to 1.17±0.91; the belongings recall increased from 1.53±0.73 to 1.90±0.31.After the intervention,Riveunead Ⅱ score of experinental group was obvious better than that of the control group with statistical significance(P<0.05).Conclusion The individualmemory training process inproves thememory of memory inpaired elderpeople.

     

/

返回文章
返回