高级检索
胡芳, 马迎华, 龚盛根, 吕晓静, 庄丽丽, 李融. 留守中学生主观幸福感与家庭功能关系[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2011, 27(6): 686-688. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2011-27-06-06
引用本文: 胡芳, 马迎华, 龚盛根, 吕晓静, 庄丽丽, 李融. 留守中学生主观幸福感与家庭功能关系[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2011, 27(6): 686-688. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2011-27-06-06
HU Fang, MA Ying-hua, GONG Sheng-gen, . Relationship between family functioning and subjective well-being among left-behind middle school students[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2011, 27(6): 686-688. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2011-27-06-06
Citation: HU Fang, MA Ying-hua, GONG Sheng-gen, . Relationship between family functioning and subjective well-being among left-behind middle school students[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2011, 27(6): 686-688. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2011-27-06-06

留守中学生主观幸福感与家庭功能关系

Relationship between family functioning and subjective well-being among left-behind middle school students

  • 摘要: 目的 了解江西省某市留守中学生主观幸福感状况,探讨主观幸福感与家庭功能关系.方法 采取分层整群抽样方法,选取江西省某市2所初中和1所高中2 330名中学生,采用主观幸福感量表和家庭功能评定量表进行问卷调查.结果(1)留守学生(单亲外出/双亲外出)的友谊、环境和生活满意度得分分别为(4.83±0.88/4.84±0.87)、(3.97±0.99/3.99±1.02)、(4.30±0.68/4.32±0.68)分,低于非留守学生的(4.93±0.88)、(4.12±1.01)、(4.39±0.69)分(P<0.05),双亲外出学生消极情感得分为(2.67±0.89)分,高于非留守学生的(2.55±0.91)分和单亲外出学生的(2.54±0.84)分;(2)留守学生(单亲外出/双亲外出)的角色扮演和情感介入得分分别为(2.31±0.32/2.31±0.30)、(2.21±0.47/2.25±0.44)分,高于非留守学生的(2.27±0.31)、(2.20±0.42)分(P<0.05);(3)除单亲外出学生的消极情感与问题解决无关,其他各维度间均显著相关(P<0.05);对不同类型学生而言,家庭功能的7个维度与其生活满意度、积极情感、消极情感和总体幸福感的相关程度不同;(4)不同类型学生总体幸福感模型引进的变量不同,总体幸福感得分均随各引进变量得分的增加而减少,家庭功能水平可以预测总体幸福感水平.结论 留守使学生主观幸福感的部分维度受到负面影响;家庭功能影响主观幸福感水平.

     

    Abstract: Objective To describe the status of subjective well-being among left-behind students in a city of Jiangxi province and to explore the relationship between family functioning and subjective well-being.Methods Totally 2 330 students in two junior high schools and a senior high school in Jiangxi province were selected with stratified cluster sampling and investigated with Subjective Well-Being Scale for Adolescents and Family Assessment Device.Results The left-behind students with single parent/parents working out had lower scores(4.83±0.88/4.84±0.87,3.97±0.99/3.99±1.02,4.30±0.68/4.32±0.68) than common students(4.93±0.88,4.12±1.01,4.39±0.69) in friendship satisfaction,environment satisfaction,and life satisfaction(P < 0.05).The students with their parents working out had a higher score of negative affection(2.67±0.89) than students with their parents at home(2.55±0.91) or with mother or father working out(2.54±0.84).The left-behind students with single parent/parents working out had higher scores(2.31±0.32/2.31±0.30,2.21±0.47/2.25±0.44) than common students(2.27±0.31,2.20±0.42) in roles and affective involvement(P < 0.05).Except negative affection,other dimensions were significantly related to problem solving for students with single parent working out(P < 0.05).For different students,seven dimensions of family functioning had different degrees of relationship to their life satisfaction,positive affection,negative affection,and overall subjective well-being.For different students,different variables were included in the overall subjective well-being model,and the total subjective well-being score was reduced with the increases of scores of independent variables.Family functioning could predict the level of subjective welleing.Conclusion Single parent or both parents working out could affect some dimensions of subjective wellbeing among left-behind students and family functioning has a great influence on subjective well-being of the students.

     

/

返回文章
返回