高级检索
杜佳, 侯万里, 陈玉恒, 王红, 李倩. 服教妇女艾滋病健康教育效果及影响因素分析[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2011, 27(12): 1560-1561. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2011-27-12-24
引用本文: 杜佳, 侯万里, 陈玉恒, 王红, 李倩. 服教妇女艾滋病健康教育效果及影响因素分析[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2011, 27(12): 1560-1561. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2011-27-12-24
DU Jia, HOU Wan-li, CHEN Yu-heng, . Evaluation of lecturing and peer education on AIDS health education among penitentiary women[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2011, 27(12): 1560-1561. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2011-27-12-24
Citation: DU Jia, HOU Wan-li, CHEN Yu-heng, . Evaluation of lecturing and peer education on AIDS health education among penitentiary women[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2011, 27(12): 1560-1561. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2011-27-12-24

服教妇女艾滋病健康教育效果及影响因素分析

Evaluation of lecturing and peer education on AIDS health education among penitentiary women

  • 摘要: 目的 了解专家讲授法和同伴教育法对服教妇女艾滋病健康教育的效果及其影响因素,为采取有效的艾滋病干预措施提供参考依据。方法 整群抽取某收容教育所321名服教妇女随机分为2组,分别采用专家讲授法和同伴教育法进行艾滋病健康教育,采用自行设计统一的艾滋病知识调查表分别对2组妇女干预前后进行问卷调查,分析2种方法的干预效果及影响因素。结果 专家讲授组服教妇女艾滋病基本概念、传播途径、预防知识得分和总分干预后分别为(5.99±1.70)、(10.21±1.95)、(5.57±1.66)和(21.77±4.16)分,均高于干预前的(3.93±2.22)、(8.91±1.62)、(5.09±1.70)和(18.16±4.08)分(P<0.001);同伴教育组服教妇女干预后艾滋病基本概念、传播途径、预防知识得分和总分分别为(5.12±2.23)、(10.11±1.50)、(5.58±1.70)和(20.84±4.10)分,均高于干预前的(3.42±2.13)、(8.65±1.90)、(4.50±1.77)和(16.57±4.49)分(P<0.001);2种教育方法在提高服教妇女艾滋病的基本概念、传播途径得分和总分方面差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但同伴教育法对提高服教妇女艾滋病预防知识得分方面较专家讲授法效果明显(t=-2.39,P<0.05);多元线性回归分析结果表明,年龄是影响专家讲授法效果的主要因素,年龄越小,效果越好。结论 专家讲授法和同伴教育法对服教妇女艾滋病的健康教育效果基本一致,但同伴教育法对提高服教妇女艾滋病预防知识得分方面效果较好;年龄越小,专家讲授法的效果越好。

     

    Abstract: Objective To evaluate the effects of lecturing and peer education on AIDS health education among the penitentiary women,and to provide evidence for effective intervention measures for AIDS prevention.Methods By using cluster sampling method,a total of 321 penitentiary women were recruited from the Women Penitentiary Center and divided into two groups.Lecturing and peer education on AIDS education were conducted separaely in the two groups.A selfdesigned questionnaire was used to collect the information about AIDS know ledge and attitude before and after the intervention.Results The scores of AIDS basic know ledge,know ledge of AIDS transmission,know ledge of AIDS prevention,and the total knowledge were 5.99±1.70,10.21±1.95,5.57±1.66,and 21.77±4.16,respectively,after the intervention in the group receiving the lecturing,which were significantly higher than those before the intervention (3.93±2.22,8.91±1.62,5.09±1.70,and 18.16±4.08,respectirely,P< 0.001 for all).In the group receiving peer education,the scores of the AIDS basic know ledge,know ledge of AIDS transmission,know ledge of AIDS prevention,and the total know ledge were 5.12±2.23,10.11±1.50,5.58±1.70,and 20.84±4.10,repectively,after the intervention,w hich were also significantly higher than those before the intervention(3.42±2.13,8.65±1.90,4.50±1.77,and 16.57±4.49; P< 0.001 for all).There was no significant difference in basic knowledge,transmission know ledge,and total score between the two groups (P > 0.05 for all).The score of AIDS prevention knowledge was increased significantly in the group of peer education than that of in the group of lecturing (t=-2.39,P< 0.05).The results from multivariate linear regression analysis showed that age was the main influence factor of the effectiveness of the lecturing,and the lecturing showed better effect in the younger women.Conclusion There is no significant difference in the effect of AIDS health education between lecturing and peer education among the penitentiary women.The effect of the peer education is better for AIDS prevention know ledge than that of lecturing and the effect of the lecturing is better in younger women.

     

/

返回文章
返回