高级检索
董静, 马吉祥, 郭晓雷, 张迎修, 鹿子龙, 张吉玉, 楚洁, 唐俊利. 山东省中小学生健康行为干预效果评价[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2012, 28(3): 408-410. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2012-28-03-74
引用本文: 董静, 马吉祥, 郭晓雷, 张迎修, 鹿子龙, 张吉玉, 楚洁, 唐俊利. 山东省中小学生健康行为干预效果评价[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2012, 28(3): 408-410. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2012-28-03-74
DONG Jing, MA Ji-xiang, GUO Xiao-lei, . Evaluation on health behavior intervention among primary and middle school students in Shandong provice[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2012, 28(3): 408-410. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2012-28-03-74
Citation: DONG Jing, MA Ji-xiang, GUO Xiao-lei, . Evaluation on health behavior intervention among primary and middle school students in Shandong provice[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2012, 28(3): 408-410. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2012-28-03-74

山东省中小学生健康行为干预效果评价

Evaluation on health behavior intervention among primary and middle school students in Shandong provice

  • 摘要: 目的 评价以健康教育课为主的综合干预措施对山东省中小学生健康行为的干预效果,为学校的健康促进工作提供参考依据.方法 采用随机化对照实验研究方法对在山东省沂源县和寿光市中小学校随机抽取的600名干预组学生和399名对照组学生进行健康行为问卷调查.结果 干预前,干预组和对照组学生对健康知识的总体知晓率分别为52.3%和51.3%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);干预后,干预组学生对健康知识的总体知晓率为70.9%,高于对照组学生的54.4%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);干预前,干预组与对照组学生在健康相关态度和行为7道题的正确率差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);干预后,除"吸烟不是成熟的标志"外,其他6题干预组学生的正确率均高于干预前(P<0.05)和对照组学生(P<0.01);干预后干预组学生主动向家人和朋友宣传健康知识的学生比例为90.0%,高于对照组学生的82.7%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01).结论 在中小学生中进行以健康教育课为主的综合干预,可有效提高健康知识水平,促进其健康信念和行为的养成.

     

    Abstract: Objective To evaluate the effects of comprehensive intervention measures mainly consisting of health education class on health behavior among primary and middle school students and to provide reference for health promotion in school.Methods In Yiyuan county and Shouguang city,case-control study was used to survey 600 students in intervention group and 399 students in non-intervention group on health behavior.Results There was no significant difference in total awareness rate of health knowledge between intervention group(52.3%) and non-intervention group(54.4%) before the intervention(P > 0.05).After the intervention,the total awareness rate of health knowledge of the intervention group(70.9%) was significantly higher than that of the non-intervention one(54.4%).There was no significant difference in health-related attitude and behavior between the two groups before the intervention(P > 0.05).After the intervention,the health-related attitude and behavior in intervention group were significantly improved except “smoking is not the mature sign”(P < 0.05).After the intervention,the rate of students actively propagandizing health knowledge in the intervention group(90.0%) was significantly higher than the rate in non-intervention group(82.7%).Conclusion The level of health knowledge was improved and health-related belief and behavior were promoted by comprehensive intervention measures among primary and middle school students.

     

/

返回文章
返回