高级检索
苏方宇, 杨顺心, 王茂晋, 姜杉, 张珣, 徐佳俐, 朱燕波. 云南省不同少数民族儿童青少年生活质量状况调查[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2013, 29(12): 1828-1831. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2013-29-12-35
引用本文: 苏方宇, 杨顺心, 王茂晋, 姜杉, 张珣, 徐佳俐, 朱燕波. 云南省不同少数民族儿童青少年生活质量状况调查[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2013, 29(12): 1828-1831. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2013-29-12-35
SU Fang-yu, YANG Shun-xin, WANG Mao-jin.et al, . Quality of life among children and adolescents of different minorities in Yunnan province,China[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2013, 29(12): 1828-1831. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2013-29-12-35
Citation: SU Fang-yu, YANG Shun-xin, WANG Mao-jin.et al, . Quality of life among children and adolescents of different minorities in Yunnan province,China[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2013, 29(12): 1828-1831. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2013-29-12-35

云南省不同少数民族儿童青少年生活质量状况调查

Quality of life among children and adolescents of different minorities in Yunnan province,China

  • 摘要: 目的分析云南少数民族地区儿童青少年生活质量状况,为进一步采取干预措施提供依据。方法采用整群抽样方法,应用儿童青少年生活质量量表对云南省镇沅县和平乡、古城乡哈尼族、拉祜族和傣族聚居村寨中291名7~18岁儿童青少年进行调查。结果云南少数民族儿童青少年总体生活质量得分依次为哈尼族(141.22±13.30)分、傣族(138.55±11.96)分、拉祜族(134.20±12.15)分;拉祜族儿童青少年生活质量状况除亲子关系、负性情绪、自我满意度外,其他维度得分均低于傣族和哈尼族(P<0.01);云南3个少数民族儿童青少年总体生活质量为(137.92±12.76)分,与中国农村儿童青少年常模的(138.98±16.91)分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);师生关系、同伴关系、自我概念和运动能力4个维度得分均高于常模,学习能力与态度、作业态度、生活便利性、活动机会性和自我满意度5个维度得分均低于常模,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论云南省3个少数民族儿童青少年生活质量水平状况与中国农村常模存在不同方面的差异性,可能与区域交通的便利性和受教育的条件有关。

     

    Abstract: Objective To analyze the quality of life(QOL)among minority children and adolescents in Yunnan province,China,and to provide evidence for further intervention measurement.Methods A cluster sample of 291 minority children and adolescents aged between 7 and 18 years in Zhenyuan county of Yunnan province were investigated with the children and adolescents' QOL scale.Results The QOL score of Hani childmen and adolescents(141.22±13.30)was higher than that of Dai(138.55±11.96)and Lahu(134.20±12.15).There were significant differences in QOL scores among Hani,Dai and Lahu children and adolescents except for the factor of family relationship,negative emotion and self-satisfaction(P<0.01 for all).The overall score of QOL among the children and adolescents of the three minorities(137.92±12.76)showed no significant difference compared with the QOL level of rural children in China(138.98±16.91),but for the dimensions of relationship between teacher and student,relationship of company,self-conception,and athletic ability,the minority children and adolescents had higher scores than Chinese rural children(P<0.05 for all).The children and adolescents of the three minorities were inferior to Chinese rural level in the dimensions of study ability and attitude,homework attitude,convenience of life,chance of activity,and self-satisfaction(P<0.05 for all).Conclusion The level of QOL of minority children and adolescents is significantly diffenent from the norm of rural children in China,which may result from the conditions of the local traffic and education.

     

/

返回文章
返回