高级检索
张文娟, 郝艳华, 吴群红, 李球杰, 韩松翰, 尤佳, 陈蕾. 公众应急准备测评量表编制与信效度评价[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2014, 30(5): 650-652. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2014-30-05-34
引用本文: 张文娟, 郝艳华, 吴群红, 李球杰, 韩松翰, 尤佳, 陈蕾. 公众应急准备测评量表编制与信效度评价[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2014, 30(5): 650-652. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2014-30-05-34
ZHANG Wen-juan, HAO Yan-hua, WU Qun-hong.et al, . Establishment and evaluation of public emergency preparedness evaluation scale[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2014, 30(5): 650-652. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2014-30-05-34
Citation: ZHANG Wen-juan, HAO Yan-hua, WU Qun-hong.et al, . Establishment and evaluation of public emergency preparedness evaluation scale[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2014, 30(5): 650-652. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2014-30-05-34

公众应急准备测评量表编制与信效度评价

Establishment and evaluation of public emergency preparedness evaluation scale

  • 摘要: 目的 初步编制公众应急准备测评量表,评价其信度和效度。方法 在文献资料分析法、访谈法和问卷调查法的基础上初步确定公众应急准备测评量表的理论结构,运用项目分析、探索性因子分析和信、效度检验方法对黑龙江省哈尔滨市分层整群抽取的468名公众人群的应急准备状态进行了分析,验证理论结构的合理性和正确性。结果 通过项目分析和探索性因子分析,确定公众应急准备测评量表由风险意识、风险判断、应急认知、应急心理、应急态度和应急准备行为6个维度共23个条目组成,累积贡献率为63.378%;总量表同质信度Cronbach’sα系数为0.818,分半信度为0.884,各维度与总量表的相关系数为0.389~0.734(均P<0.01),该量表具有较好的信度和效度。结论 初步完成公众应急准备测评量表编制工作,且该量表结构较为合理。

     

    Abstract: Objective To establish a public emergency preparedness evaluation scale and to evaluate its reliability and validity.Methods The structure of the public emergency preparedness evaluation scale was formed by literature analyses, questionnaire survey and interview among the public in Harbin city.Totally 468 public figures were investigated with the public emergency preparedness evaluation scale developed.The data were analyzed with project analysis, exploratory factor analysis, and reliability and validity tests.Results The public emergency preparedness evaluation scale was established with six factors including risk awareness, risk judgment, emergency cognitive, emergency psychology, emergency attitude, and emergency preparedness actions.The reliability and validity of the scale were satisfactory, with a cumulative contribution rate of 63.378%, a coefficient of stability of 0.818, and a coefficient of split-half reliability of 0.884.The content validities were from 0.389-0.734.Conclusion The public emergency preparedness evaluation scale was developed and the structure of the scale was reasonable.

     

/

返回文章
返回