高级检索
张东军, 王丽娜, 杨世昌, 于毅. 男性监管服刑人员冲动性及影响因素分析[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2014, 30(5): 657-660. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2014-30-05-36
引用本文: 张东军, 王丽娜, 杨世昌, 于毅. 男性监管服刑人员冲动性及影响因素分析[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2014, 30(5): 657-660. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2014-30-05-36
ZHANG Dong-jun, WANG Li-na, YANG Shi-chang.et al, . Impulsivity and its influencing factors in male prisoners[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2014, 30(5): 657-660. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2014-30-05-36
Citation: ZHANG Dong-jun, WANG Li-na, YANG Shi-chang.et al, . Impulsivity and its influencing factors in male prisoners[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2014, 30(5): 657-660. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2014-30-05-36

男性监管服刑人员冲动性及影响因素分析

Impulsivity and its influencing factors in male prisoners

  • 摘要: 目的 了解男性监管服刑人员冲动性水平及其影响因素。方法 随机分层整群抽取河南省某2所监狱的456名男性监管服刑人员(研究组)及178名健康男性(对照组)采用Barratt冲动性量表第11版(BIS-11)、自我接纳问卷(SAQ)、Snyder自我监控量表个人反应问卷(SSMS)、内在-外在心理控制源量表(I-ELCS)进行问卷调查。结果 研究组的BIS-11总分及运动冲动性、无计划冲动性因子分别为(59.55±9.23)、(19.87±4.05)、(24.13±4.87)分,均高于对照组的(57.17±8.84)、(18.80±3.92)、(23.26±4.15)分,差异均有统计学意义(t=2.954、3.201、2.258,P<0.05);研究组的SAQ、SSMS总分分别为(40.79±5.14)、(10.41±3.55)分,均低于对照组的(43.15±6.17)、(11.56±3.92)分;而I-ELCS得分为(11.43±4.07)分,高于对照组的(9.33±4.01)分;差异均有统计学意义(t=-4.901、-3.547、5.862,P<0.01);服刑人员的冲动性与自我接纳、自我监控均呈负相关(r=-0.358、-0.157,P<0.01),与心理控制源呈正相关(r=0.161,P<0.01);文化程度(b=-3.111,P=0.000)、自我评价因子(b=-0.658,P=0.000)、自我接纳因子(b=-0.548,P=0.000)、自我监控力(b=-0.438,P=0.000)及心理控制源(b=0.297,P=0.002)对冲动性具有预测作用(51.3%)。结论 男性监管服刑人员具有较高的冲动性,文化程度、自我接纳水平、自我监控力和心理控制源对于冲动性具有重要的影响。

     

    Abstract: Objective To evaluate the level of male prisoners' impulsivity and its influencing factors.Methods Barratt Impulsiveness Scale 11th Version(BIS-11), Self-Acceptance Questionnaire(SAQ), Synder' Self-Monitoring Scale(SSMS), and Internal-External Locus of Control Scale(I-ELCS) were used to assess 456 male prisoners in two prisons and 178 healthy men selected with stratified randoml sampling in Henan province.Results The scores of impulsivity, motor impulsivity, nonplanning impulsivity of male prisoners were 59.55±9.23, 19.87±4.05, and 24.13±4.87, which were significantly higher than those of the healthy men(57.17±8.84, 18.80±3.92, and 23.26±4.15)(P<0.05 for all).The male prisoners' scores of SAQ(40.79±5.14) and SSMS(10.41±3.55) were lower than those of the healthy men(43.15±6.17 and 11.56±3.92)(P<0.05 for both), but the former(11.43±4.07) was higher than the latter(9.33±4.01) for the score of I-ELCS(P<0.05).The impulsivity was negatively correlated with self-acceptance and self-control(P<0.05), but was positively correlated with locus of control(P<0.05).The multiple regression analyses showed that educational level(b=-3.111, P=0.000), self-evaluation(b=-0.658, P=0.000), self-acceptance(b=-0.548, P=0.000), self-monitoring(b=-0.438, P=0.000), and locus of control(b=0.297, P=0.002) had predictive effect on impulsivity.Conclusion Male prisoners have higher impulsivity.The male prisoners' educational level, self-acceptance level, self-monitoring and locus of control have important impacts on their impulsivity.

     

/

返回文章
返回