高级检索
肖骞, 程慧, 石向辉, 牛姬飞. 聚集性干预活动对MSM性网络及HIV传播影响[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2016, 32(4): 541-543. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2016-32-04-34
引用本文: 肖骞, 程慧, 石向辉, 牛姬飞. 聚集性干预活动对MSM性网络及HIV传播影响[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2016, 32(4): 541-543. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2016-32-04-34
XIAO Qian, CHENG Hui, SHI Xiang-hui.et al, . Effect of cluster interventions on MSM sexual network and HIV transmission[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2016, 32(4): 541-543. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2016-32-04-34
Citation: XIAO Qian, CHENG Hui, SHI Xiang-hui.et al, . Effect of cluster interventions on MSM sexual network and HIV transmission[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2016, 32(4): 541-543. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2016-32-04-34

聚集性干预活动对MSM性网络及HIV传播影响

Effect of cluster interventions on MSM sexual network and HIV transmission

  • 摘要: 目的 探讨聚集性干预活动对深圳市男男性行为者(MSM)性网络及艾滋病病毒(HIV)传播的影响。方法 于2015年7-10月在深圳市福田区采用同伴推动抽样法招募研究对象,问卷调查并抽血检测HIV感染情况。结果 379名研究对象,平均性网络规模为5.16,平均性网络密度为0.33,平均性网络联接度为3.71;性网络规模为6.7的MSM参加聚集性干预活动为67.78%(143/211),高于性网络规模为3.1的MSM(55.36%,93/168))(P<0.05);其感染HIV阳性率为16.11%(34/211),高于后者(8.93%,15/168)(P<0.05);性网络密度为0.5的MSM参加聚集性干预活动为74.50%(149/200),高于性网络密度为0.3的MSM(48.60%,87/149)(P<0.05);其感染HIV阳性率为18.50%,高于后者(6.70%)(P<0.05);HIV阳性MSM参加聚集性干预活动为77.55%,HIV阴性MSM参加率为60.00%(P<0.05,OR=2.30)。结论 聚集性干预活动在一定程度上扩大了深圳地区MSM性网络规模,增加了MSM性网络密度,促进HIV传播。

     

    Abstract: Objective To examine the effect of cluster interventions on men who have sex with men(MSM) sexual network and human immunodeficiency virus(HIV) transmission in Shenzhen city.Methods Questionnaire survey and blood test for HIV infection were conducted among 379 MSM recruited with respondent-driven sampling in Futian district of Shenzhen city between July and October 2015.Results Among the MSM surveyed, the average size of sexual network was 5.16;the average density of sexual network was 0.33;and the average degree of sexual network connection was 3.71.For the MSM involved with the sexual network of size 6.7, 67.78% participated in cluster interventions and 16.11% were HIV positive;while, for those with the network of size 3.1, 55.36% participated in cluster interventions and 8.93% were HIV positive;there were significant differences in the ratio of participating in cluster intervention and HIV positive rate between the MSM involved with the sexual network of different size(both P<0.05).The MSM, who were involved with the sexual network of 0.5 in density, had significantly higher proportion(74.50% vs.48.60%) of participating in cluster interventions and higher HIV positive rate(18.50% vs.6.70%) compared to the MSM involved with the sexual network of 0.3 in density(both P<0.05).Among the HIV-negative MSM, 60.00% participated in cluster interventions;while, among the HIV-positive MSM, 77.55% participated in cluster interventions, with an odds ratio of 2.30(P<0.05).Conclusion Cluster interventions may expand the size and increase the density of the MSM's sexual network, thus contribute to the spread of HIV among the MSM in Shenzhen city.

     

/

返回文章
返回