高级检索
张秀春, 胡经畲, 周少莲, 关增智, 李立琴. 不同免疫程序HFRS双价灭活疫苗免疫效果观察[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2003, 19(3): 287-288.
引用本文: 张秀春, 胡经畲, 周少莲, 关增智, 李立琴. 不同免疫程序HFRS双价灭活疫苗免疫效果观察[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2003, 19(3): 287-288.
ZHANG Xiu-chun, HU Jing-yu, ZHOU Shao-lian, . Study on immune effect and persistence of bivalent inactivated vaccine with different immune schedule on epidemic hemorrhagic fever[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2003, 19(3): 287-288.
Citation: ZHANG Xiu-chun, HU Jing-yu, ZHOU Shao-lian, . Study on immune effect and persistence of bivalent inactivated vaccine with different immune schedule on epidemic hemorrhagic fever[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2003, 19(3): 287-288.

不同免疫程序HFRS双价灭活疫苗免疫效果观察

Study on immune effect and persistence of bivalent inactivated vaccine with different immune schedule on epidemic hemorrhagic fever

  • 摘要:
      目的   观察不同免疫程序肾综合征出血热(HFRS)双价灭活疫苗的免疫效果, 确定最佳免疫方案。
      方法   采用流行病学实验方法, 将158名10~12岁儿童随机分组后按不同免疫程序进行免疫, 基础免疫后0.5个月、6个月、12个月、24个月及2年加强免疫后0.5个月采血检测HFRS荧光抗体及中和抗体。
      结果   2针(0, 14d)与3针(0, 7, 28d)组间、2针加强(0, 14d, 6个月)与3针加强(0, 7, 28d, 6个月)组间荧光抗体及中和抗体阳性率及GMT比无显着性差异; 6个月加强1针在免后12~24月中, 荧光抗体阳性率高于未加强组, 短期(2年内)效果优于未加强组; 免疫2年加强免疫后0.5个月, 4组荧光抗体及中和抗体阳性率迅速升至9655%~100.0%。
      结论   既定3针基础免疫程序可简化为2针; 6个月进行加强免疫为宜。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective   To observe the immune effect of bivalent inactivated vaccine on epidemic hemorrhagic fever with different schedules, to determine the best immune schedules further.
      Methods   To use the method of epidemiological experiment.According to the principle of random, 158 children aged 10-12 and IFAT antibody negative were divided into 5 groups and allocated different immune process.The serum after being immunized two weeks and 0.5, 6, 12, 24 month and 2 years were collected after a booster and indirect immunofluorescent method and Mcro-CEP method and the antibody in the serum was detected.
      Results   The effect of bivalent inactivated vaccine on epidemic hemorrhagic fever with two doses in 0, 14 days compared with three doses in 0, 7, 28 days existed no difference between them for two weeks to two years after being immunized.The effect of the vaccine with two doses in 0, 14 days and a booster in 6 month compared with three doses in 0, 7, 28 days and a booster in 6 month existed no difference between them either.The effects to give a booster in 6 month were better than no booster in 1-2 years after being immunized.After the primary immunization for 2 years, a booster was given to all groups.The prevalence and GMT of antibody was increasing quickly.
      Conclusion   The immune process of three doses(0, 7, 28 dyas)may be simplified to become the immune process of two doses(0, 14 days).It was better to give a booster in 6 month.

     

/

返回文章
返回