高级检索
余善法, 张锐. 不同心理控制源水平管理人员紧张程度比较[J]. 中国公共卫生, 1999, 15(6): 516-518.
引用本文: 余善法, 张锐. 不同心理控制源水平管理人员紧张程度比较[J]. 中国公共卫生, 1999, 15(6): 516-518.
Yu Shanfa, Zhang Rui. The comparative study of occupational stress between externals and internals[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 1999, 15(6): 516-518.
Citation: Yu Shanfa, Zhang Rui. The comparative study of occupational stress between externals and internals[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 1999, 15(6): 516-518.

不同心理控制源水平管理人员紧张程度比较

The comparative study of occupational stress between externals and internals

  • 摘要: 采用一般工作紧张问卷、职业紧张指标和工作心理控制源量表对235名管理人员进行了测试。结果发现外控性强者人际关系、认知负荷、工作单调性、角色模糊、工作家庭平衡、技术利用不足、工作前景的未知性和来自同事和上级的支持的评分均显着高于内控性者,而对人负责、对事负责、工作满意感、心理卫生和自尊感评分则显着低于内控性者。结果提示外控性强者所经历的紧张因素多于内控性强者,对紧张因素的反应更为强烈。

     

    Abstract: To explore the difference of the occupational stress between externals and internals, 235 managers were investigatedby using Generic Job Stress Questionnaier, Occupational Stress Indicator(OSI) and Work Locus of Control Scale(WLCS). It is found that the externals scored significantly higher on personal relationships, recognition, job monotonousness,role ambguity, home/work balance, skill under utilization, job future ambiguity, social support from supervisor and other people at work than the internals, but opposite findings were found on respon sibility for people and things, job satisfaction, mental health and self-esteem. The results of this study suggested that the externals experienced more stressthan the intenals, externals were more likely to be affected by stressors, which leaded to more serious strain outcomes.

     

/

返回文章
返回